This popular diet will not help you lose weight, discover a new study
The researchers compared this weight loss approach with the counting of standard calories.
Most of us know it trying tolosing weight: There are countless different approaches presented as the most effective method, and several brand regimes that claim to offer the fastest or most durable option. These are often called "fashionable diets" because they tend to enter and get out of fashion. Solutions such as the ketogenic diet (keto), which focuses on the rich fatty intake, and the Atkins diet, famous for its low -carbohydrate approach, are two of these weight loss trends, but the Efficiency of these regimes is often debated by dietitists and health professionals. In fact, a recent study has evaluated another popular diet and found that it has in fact not having additional weight loss services. Read more on what approaches say that experts will not help you lose books.
Read this then:If this happens when you eat or drink, you need your thyroid.
What we eat affects not only our weight, but also our risk for certain health conditions.
Food affects our body in more ways than the simple number you see when you go up on the scale. Research has shown that different foods and drinks can both help and harm your health, a recent study suggesting thatdrink tea could reduce your risk ofDementia development. Conversely, eatHighly processed foods was found atImpact of memory And could put you more in danger for the disease. Maintaining a healthy diet and ensuring that we are properly fooding our body can be difficult, which is why so many of us turn to diets that provide a specific plan or list of restrictions. But you may want to ignore a popular approach because it doesn't seem to do much.
The restriction of your diet at specific periods of the day has not proved to be effective.
You've probably heard the term "intermittent fast", which includes a food approach called restriction in time. When you follow this diet, consumption is limited to a period of six to eight hours a day. The researchers hypothesized that eating during a certain window aligns with ourCircadian clock, which helps the body to fulfill different essential functions throughout the day. theThe approach made success in small subsets of study, including rats and a small group of people with obesity, according toThe New York Times, but a new study has revealed that the restricted food over time may not have a real effect.
The results of the study were published inThe New England Journal of MedicineOn April 21, researchers concluding that, among obesity participants,eat restricted time "was not more beneficial with regard to the reduction of body weight, body fat or metabolic risk factors than the restriction of daily calories."
The researchers studied patients for an entire year.
Researchers from the Southern Medical University of Guangzhou, China, included a total of 139 patients in the study, of which 118 experienced a monitoring visit at 12 months. All participants followed a limited power supply - consists of 1,500 to 1,800 calories per day for men and 1,200 to 1,500 calories for women - with a group also following a limited diet in time, eating that between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
Participants of the two groups lost weight, an average between 14 and 18 pounds, but there was no significant difference between the two groups at 12 months. There was also no difference when analyzing the size, the body mass index (BMI), the lean mass, the blood pressure and metabolic risk factors. When the number of undesirable events is examined (an unexpected medical problem that occurred during the study) in each group, there was no substantial differences either.
Experts say you don't necessarily need to avoid eating time.
Although the study results suggest that the restriction of the temporal window to eat is not effective, that does not mean that this will not work for you, said health experts.AE0FCC31AE342FD3A1346EBB1F342FCB
"Almost Every Type of Diet Out There Works for Some People,"Christopher Gardner, PHD, Director of Nutrition Studies at the Stanford Prevention Research Center, ToldThe New York Times. "But the Take-Home supported by this New Research is that when subjected to a properly designed and conductive study—Scientify investigation—it is not any more helpful Than Simply Reducing Daily Calorie Intake for Weight Loss and Health Factors."
More Research is Needed to Better Understand Time-Restricted Eating and Why It May Help Some People and Not Others. For those who have difficulties counting calories Every Day, in particular, this form of intermittent fasting is a viable alternative.
"Although this approach has not proved better, it does not seem to be worse" than the simple counting of calories, Louis J. Arnone , MD, director of the full weight control center for Weill Cornell Medicine in New York, told The temperature . "This gives patients more success options."
Read this then: This vitamin could reduce the risk of dementia, discovers a new study .
