6 nobody's movie endings understood
These conclusions have launched countless Reddit sons filled with theories.
There are few things as frustrating for moviegoers who like to have a loose end attached as dedicating two hours of their time to a film to stay wondering What really happened at the end of this one. Fortunately, there is the Internet, where any confused spectator can seek theories and interpretations as to what was really going on in the intermediary bank village or who is really dead and how Mulholland Drive . Sometimes, however, the final of a film is so ambiguous or obtuse that there is not even consensus as to what all this means. Read the rest for six ends of films that almost no one understood. Spoilers to come!
Read this then: 7 Oscar -winning films that are offensive according to today's standards .
1 I think about the end of things (2020)
Charlie Kaufman Film 2020 I think about the end of things is based on the 2016 novel by Ian Reid And follow Jake ( Jesse Plemons ) And his girlfriend ( Jessie Buckley ) While they make a snowy roadtrip with his parents for Thanksgiving. Seeing that this film was written and directed by the screenwriter behind Adaptation And Be John Malkovich , it was a fact that things become a lot, much stranger from there.
Jake's parents, played mainly by Toni Collette And David Thewlis , change the ages; His girlfriend is mentioned by a handful of different names; And she receives mysterious telephone calls from an anonymous person. Throughout the events of their trip and their visit, viewers are also presented to a high school concierge who crosses her daily functions, who are apparently completely separated from the rest of the plot-that is to say until As their paths intersect. When Jake decides to stop in his former school, his girlfriend has a conversation with the concierge, telling her that she is not even in a relationship with Jake and that he was just a scary guy who was watching her one night .
Among other strange events, the film ends with Jake on stage in the applauding school auditorium while it accepts a Nobel Prize. It then seems that Jake and the concierge are the same person and that Jake's girlfriend is a complete construction of his imagination, based on a pretty woman he saw once. But the film does not explain exactly.
Kaufman told Indiewire in 2020 that he wanted to play with the idea that the young woman was An extension of Jake And also having an "agency", which probably explains why so many fans are confused at the end. "I'm not really big to explain what things are," said the filmmaker. "I let people live their experiences, so I don't really have expectations about what people will think. I really support the interpretation of anyone."
2 Donnie Darko (2001)
Located at the end of the 1980s, Donnie Darko , written and produced by Richard Kelly In 2001, stars Jake Gyllenhaal as a titular adolescent. One night, when Donnie is sleeping, he meets a being of another world in a rabbit costume that tells him that the world ends with just over 28 days. He also finds when he returns home in the morning that he narrowly escaped death; An engine of an airplane inexplicably crushed in his family's house - in his room.
While Donnie goes to therapy and gets closer to a classmate named Gretchen ( Jena Malone ), he continues to receive visits from Frank, who encourages him to learn about time travel. He made more tenders of Frank, in a memorable case, which led to a Ringard motivating speaker ( Patrick Swayze ) being exposed as a pedophile. On the 28th day, Gretchen is struck and killed by a car, who turns out to be led by the boyfriend of Donnie Elizabeth's sister ( Maggie Gyllenhaal ) - A apparently normal guy named Frank ( James Duval ) Dressed in a rabbit costume because he is Halloween. In the end, Donnie looks at the formation of a kind of time vortex above the city, which zaps him at the start of the film - only this time, he sleeps in his bed and is instantly killed by the engine to falling jet.
Even the star of the film does not understand what it really means. "What is Donnie Darko about? I have no idea, "Gyllenhaal wrote in the introduction of the release in 2003, The book Donnie Darko ,, As Digital Spy reported . But in 2004, the film was reissued in the form of a director's cup, which added 20 minutes and made the concepts in the fictitious book, The philosophy of time travel , by the old woman Roberta Sparrow more explicit and their link with the events of the clearer film. As explained by the show, most of the events Donnie Darko take place In a tangent universe This must be destroyed via Donnie's death, so the world as we know does not end.
So ... Does that mean that Donnie was technically dead all the time? "I think that the film maintains that life and death can perhaps coexist, that time is not necessarily a purely linear thing", " Kelly said Nme in 2016.
For more entertainment trivia sent directly to your reception box, Register for our daily newsletter .
3 Principle (2020)
According to many fans of Christopher Nolan Principle , you have to watch the science fiction thriller more than one time To even have the hope of obtaining it. The film plays with time and reality, while viewers follow the protagonist ( John David Washington ), a former CIA agent who is part of a top secret organization called Tenet. He is responsible for going back in time and using a special algorithm to mainly prevent the Second World War.
To do that, like Gq explains, he and his team must inverted time , which means that there are several deadlines to follow during its mission. At the end of the film, the protagonist reverses time and learns that he really recruited itself to the operation and created the entire organization of Tenet in the first place.
Robert Pattinson , who plays the manager of protagonist Neil, understands why moviegoers could be overwhelmed by the twists and turns of the intrigue. "Many things in this film are world construction exhibition stuff and a dense story. And the script makes it accessible to a layman," he said Irish era Before Principle Release. "And it's really difficult to get this balance so that it sounds like a natural dialogue and trying to pass information that you probably need a doctorate to understand correctly."
For his part, Nolan believes that not understanding all aspects of Principle - or similar films - is sort of the point. "The interesting thing in the movies is, you know, looking at the thriller genre in particular, you are not supposed to understand all the aspects", " He said to NPR A few months after the film was released. "You are supposed to go on a trip, go through the labyrinth, understand the things you need to understand for the challenges of the scene in which you are, then you arrive at the end of the film and you have been on a trip and you understand how you are there. It's the key. "
4 The brilliant (1980)
Since its release in 1980, Stanley Kubrick's version of The brilliant , adapted from Stephen King The classic horror novel was terrifying from viewers. And that has also aroused many conversations on the true sense of photography at the end of the film. AE0FCC31AE342FD3A1346EBB1F342FCB
The film begins with Jack ( Jack Nicholson ), his wife Wendy ( Shelley Duvall ), and his son Danny ( Danny Lloyd ), Moving to the Overlook hotel in Colorado, where Jack will serve as a winter guard and will try to break the block of his writer. But the guards did not behave particularly well in the overlook, as the family learns soon. While Danny begins to show evidence of "The Shining" with telepathy and visions, Jack begins to go violently crazy, finally turning on his wife and son. Wendy and Danny can escape Jack by losing it in the hedge labyrinth on the hotel's field. After the public saw that Jack frozen to death, we see him again - associate and smiling on a photo suspended from the wall dated July 4, 1921.
Some take the presence of Jack in the photo to signify that the haunted hotel has completely taken possession of him , the cursed to resonate throughout his history. But Kubrick had a different intention. In an interview with Michel Ciment For his 1980 book Kubrick , the filmmaker said the photo " suggests reincarnation "From Jack.
5 Creation (2010)
Director who has no problem challenging the public, Christopher Nolan returns to this list with his 2010 thriller Creation . Leonardo DiCAPRI He plays the role of COBB, a thief who has access to what he wants by invading people's dreams and "extract" information. He is poached by one of his marks ( Ken Watanabe ), who hires COBB to do a very different job: enter the dreams of the son ( Cillian Murphy ) of his rival business with the aim of "creation", that is to say to place an idea that he will accept as one of his family.
Entering dreams is a delicate business, apparently because it is easy to lose track of reality. COBB encourages each member of their team to have a totem - an object they can use to check whether they are in the real world or not. He frequently uses his, because he chooses imprudent to visit his deceased wife badly ( Marion Cotillard ) In her own dreams and is often tempted to stay with her. It is a summit, which will only turn (as it would) if it was actually. At the end of the film, the mission ended, COBB returns home safely to his children. Where is it? He takes out the top of his pocket and turns it on a table, but the film cuts in credits before being able to fall.
In a 2010 interview with Weekly entertainment ,, Nolan laughed at the idea Whether he would easily abandon an answer to know if COBB is always in a dream or not. In addition, he insisted that the final response cannot be found anywhere in the film, despite all the crumbs of bread to follow.
"There can be nothing in the film which tells you in one way or another, because then the ambiguity at the end of the film would be only an error," said Nolan. "It would represent a failure of the film to communicate something. But it is not a mistake ... The real point of the scene - and that's what I say to people - is that COBB does not look at the summit. He looks at his children. He left him behind. It is the emotional meaning of the thing. "
6 Lobster (2015)
Lobster is a dark comedy of the director Yorgos Lanthimos ( The favourite ) that features Colin Farrell Like David, who is taken to a bizarre hotel after the death of his wife. If he does not find another appropriate companion during his 45 -day stay, he will literally be turned, like all the other solitary, in animals and has transformed in the forest outside the hotel. His brother has become a dog and David decides that he will be a lobster, if his second chance of love does not train.
After a romance with a character known as a heartless woman ( Angeliki Papoulia ) Go terribly pain, David escapes in the forest where he meets a short -see woman ( Rachel Weisz ). Being also in sight, he finds a kinship with her, and they end up being part of a plot of the other solitary who escaped to overthrow the hotel staff. When the solitary leader ( Léa Seydoux ) Discover that the short -sighted woman and David plan a life together, she blinds her, removing the only thing they have in common. The two escape anyway, and the film ends with David standing in the bathroom of a restaurant, holding a steak knife as if to blind.
The whole film is obviously surreal, but the end of Lobster unleashed many interpretations . First, there is the question of whether David or not with himself. Then fans must wonder, what would that mean if he did it? Does he finally see clearly by removing his own view from him? Is this a treatise on the sacrifices required by love? The public remains divided .
Lanthimos said Los Angeles Times When the film was released He does not know" What it means and frankly, in a way, I like it like that. "I think you are doing this kind of work because you have any questions. And the films we have made, we have tried to structure in a way that they are very open and that people can experiment them in different ways According to whom they are. I can give you an answer, but it will be as valid as someone else's response, "he said. In the same interview, Farrell explained: "The creative process of Yorgos is a born of curiosity and does not arrive in any place of clear definition. And it is an incredibly meticulous process for him to give birth to so much uncertainty. He is a very meticulous director. "