Good Lifestyle

When Meghan Markle and Prince Harry chose to give up their roles as members of the royal family and move to Montecito to raise their family, they shocked the whole world. After all, the youngest son of King Charles and Princess Diana had grown up as Royal, and get used to everything that goes with: 24/7 security, titles and never have to worry about money. However, before abandoning their life in the United Kingdom, the couple tried to negotiate a compromise in which they would be entitled to more freedom, but could also benefit from the advantages that accompany royal life. Now, a royal expert says that Prince Harry is guilty of "wanting his cake and eating it too".

The expert underlines that Harry, who tries to go against the British government for having kidnapped his security after leaving his royal post, wants the best of both worlds: security and freedom financed by the government to live in As long as an ordinary person.

"Prince Harry has a penchant to" want his cake and eat it too, "said Royal Hilary Forwich expert at Fox News Digital." He would like royal protection, access and attendance during family events royal so that he can tattletal. However, at the same time, wants "his privacy" while hiring three public relations companies? "

She also underlines that her request for the wearing of a military uniform during her grandmother's funeral was quite hypocritical. "He wanted to carry his military uniform during his beloved [grandmother] [grandmother] funeral but does not want to work as royal?" Said Forwich.AE0FCC31AE342FD3A1346EBB1F342FCB

She also points out that this trend started well before leaving the Royals. "He wanted the buried rules to bear a beard at his marriage, despite the army policy concerning the beard which restricting them only to cultivate with the authority of the commander," continued Forwich. "Exceptions are generally granted only for medical or religious reasons or where tradition allows it. It has therefore obtained a personal exemption from the Queen of His Majesty Elizabeth II, but it is never enough."

Forwich also underlines the baptism of the son Archie de Harry, who was a private affair. "The royal protocol is to share the birth with the nation, but the baptism of Archie in July 1919 could not have been more private because it was held with less than 25 guests in the private chapel of Windsor Castle", she added. "This kind of secret - sending the message to the public that even if we would like you to listen to our whining and our whining on our mental problems, we don't even want to share this with you - started sewing the seam of the seeds , for the public, that the Sussex went too far with their hypocritical habits. "

Shannon Felton Spence, another royal expert, agrees, adding that their behavior is "as leaving your job and expecting the company to always pay your advantages". "Everything they want is part of the benefits package," she said. "They left work."

"It's not such a bad thing for Harry to want to find another way of life for the online [fifth] for the throne," said Spence. "The survival of the monarchy depends on a more rationalized royal family. If he found a way to really get out of life as a royal who works and to be financially independent without harming the institution, it would be a huge Victory. This would actually benefit Charlotte and Louis in the future by providing a roadmap for what is possible once you are too far on the succession line. But that's not what they wanted. wanted all freedom and advantages. And it's not work. So it's now more a mess than already. "