Good Lifestyle

Walmart and Walgreens Offer many similar services to consumers, fill out and sell orders to offer almost all the rest of your shopping list. But with so much inventory, everything did not come from these two retailers, it will be well received. In fact, binoculars have targeted the two companies on the sale of a particular product. Read it to find out what Walmart and Walgreens are under fire for buyers.

RELATED:Walgreens will not let you do that, effective immediately.

Buyers pursue Walmart and Walgreens for the patch of the lidocaine they sell, first-rate actions reported on April 13th. According to legal news, two double-class action lawsuits were lodged at the Federal Court of New York on April 11, accusing retailers of consumer violations of the state and the federal government laws relating to this product. . Lidocaine is alocal anesthetic medicine It is supposed to control, prevent and relieve pain through numbness, according to the Mayo clinic.

A spokesman for Walgreens saidBetter life That society does not "comment on waiting dispute", while a spokesman for Walmart said they "would consider the complaint once we would be served and reachable as appropriate in court".

"We expect our suppliers to provide products that comply with all applicable laws, including labeling", Walmart spokespersonRandy Hargrove added.

Lidocaine patches are often prescribed by a physician, but some retailers also sell them in the form of medicines on the counter (OTC). The two plaintiffs,Michael Toporek andNaomy Altagracia Gonzalez Rodriguez, Alleguez in their respective prosecutions that Walgreens and Walmart falsely marketing their lidocaine products of the COD. According to first class actions, the costumes say that both retailers use advertising campaigns that their patches provide "pain relief" through a "flexible patch of Stay-Met", intended to work up to 12 time.

"However, the complaints, the representations and guarantees of the defendant are false and misleading," the status of prosecution. "Despite an appropriate demand, the products commonly fall from consumer organizations, depriving consumers with advertised benefits."

Related: For more detail news delivered directly to your inbox,Sign up for our daily newsletter.

The two plaintiffs also target Walmart and Walgrens on the use of the "maximum force" label on some of the liaidocaine products they sell. According to first class actions, the prosecutions claim that some of the patchs announced in this level of force force contain only 4% of lidocaine - which is lower than that of other products available on the market.AE0FCC31AE342FD3A1346EBB1F342FCB

The defendant's "maximum force" claims are false and misleading because other products are available offering lidocaine patches containing 5% lidocaine, "the status of prosecution. They allege that this allowed consumers to buy and pay more for lidocaine products in Walgreens and Walmart under false pretexts, by first class actions.

The lawsuits of Walmart and Walgreens in New York continue businesses on behalf of all consumers who have purchased lidocaine revenue from one or other resellers from the United States, according to First class actions, the two complainants are "seeking class certification, fees, fees. , Damages of $ 500 per transaction, additional punitive damages and jury trial. "

But these are not the only retailers who have recently been pursued on the sale of lidocaine patches. In February 2022, the CVs affected similar action of action in California, according to the legal press. Applicant Sandra Chacon also pursues this company on false advertising requests Alleging that the maximum lidocaine patches of the maximum health of CVS are not in reality maximum force as they are marketed. These fixes contain only 4% lidocaine also, according to this trial.

RELATED: Walmart is now banned to sell you this .