Walmart is under fire for using this word on products
A federal trial has been deposited against the largest retailer in the world accordingly.
Thanks to an inventory that has everything, including household essential elements, grocery stores, clothing, electronic products and even jewelry, Walmart is aSingle-use destination For millions of people in the United States, most regular customers trust the store to providearticles that they can count on at the lowest possible price. But now, Walmart comes under fire for allegedly misleading customers with some products. Read it to see what has landed the world's largest retailer in hot water with the federal government.
RELATED:If you shop at Walmart, get ready for these major changes.
Walmart is pursued by the federal government to falsely distinguish products with bamboo.
On April 8, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a legal action against Walmart and Kohl to transport products that have falsely involved that they have been made withenvironmentally friendly bamboo In reality, they have been made with a rayon. The list of misleading articles includedBedding, towels and bras Advertised as "environmentally friendly" and "in harmony with nature", reports the business initiate.
The process of manufacturing the bamboo rayon is harmful to the environment.
In its trial, the FTC states that only products made from authentic bamboo fibers can be labeled as such. Radius, which is a synthetic rubber, can be made with a "purified cellulose" from bamboo after its fluid transformation, mixed with chemicals and finally solidified fibers. In such cases, the Agency stipulates that the products must be marked as "rayon made from bamboo", especially when accompanied by affirmations that the article is environmentally friendly, insiders of The company.
The costume asserts that Walmart has been warned of public announcements since 2010 and was evenMultiple alert letters issued. "Independently of the source of cellulose, the manufacturing process involves the use of hazardous chemicals and the resulting fiber is a rayon and not of cotton, wood or bamboo fiber," writes the agency in its deposit .
RELATED:For more information up to date, sign up for our daily newsletter.
Walmart and Kohl have both paid millions of dollars each to adjust the combination.
Following the prosecution, Walmart agreed to pay $ 3 million to resolve the case, while Kohl paid $ 2.5 million in civilian sanctions. The FTC states that fines are the most important paid on misleading claims on the use of bamboo in products to date. In addition, the two companies will have to provide evidence of any ecological complaint or the authenticity of bamboo materials used when marketing retail items,Wall Street's Journalreports.
"False environmental affirmations underestimates both consumers and honest businesses"Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC Consumer Protection Bureau, said in a statement on April 8 "Companies Greenwash can expect to pay a price."
When reached for comments,Randy Hargrove, a spokesman for the company saidBetter life: "We are committed to being the most confident retailer and to take these claims seriously. We are responsible for any questions such as these are raised. We have worked to strengthen our product description programs and S To wait for our suppliers to provide products that comply with all laws, including those around labeling. We value our relationship with the FTC and are delighted to be able to work with them to solve these problems. "
This is not the only recent Walmart trial has been seen due to products from society.
This is not the only time recently products on Walmart's shelves drew aPursuit against society. In November 2021, Skateboard Fashion CompanyVans continued Walmart, alleging that the company had copied and sold more than 20 Knockoff versions of the van shoes. As indicated by Reuters, a Federal Court of California temporarilySale of Walmart blocked of these shoes earlier this month.AE0FCC31AE342FD3A1346EBB1F342FCB
In January, the company filed a designer in which he called "weak", and maintained that the brand of shoes "does not suffer irreparable harm". However, US District JudgeDavid Carter published an injunction on March 31, claiming that Walmart's shoes, especially time and true, no borders and the Wonder Nation, "Clearly support striking similarities"At the old" Vans "Skool shoe. As a result, Walmart will be forbidden to sell the shoes for the duration of the trademark violation litigation.
"We examine the order and consider our options. We plan to continue to defend society," Walmart saidBetter life in an email.Better lifestretched to vans to comment on the trial but has not heard yet.
A new study shows that women are now considered as competent as men
New danger sign that you will get early Alzheimer, says study
