Good Lifestyle

It should not have been surprising that afterPrince Harry andMeghan murder Decided to give up their royal roles and start a new life in North America, they would become much more active in terms of policy and struggle for social justice here in the United States. But in September, the duke and the duchess came under fire to appear in aTime 100 video where they encouraged Americans to vote at the 2020 presidential elections. Without mentioning a specific candidate, Harry-who said, "I have never been able to vote in the U.K. My entire life" - Voters "to"dismiss hate speech, misinformation and negativity online ", while Meghan called the 2020 presidential race" the most important election of our life ".

As a result, Meghan and Harry werecriticized in the U.K. for their so-called protocol break. They touched aTorrent of the editorials in Great Britain To go against long-standing practice confirmed byQueen Elizabeth That she and her family remain politically neutral at any time.

But, at a time ofhuge social change and political upheavals around the world and when members of the highest royal family of the royal family look into the political arena, the rest of theThe family maintains a neutral position on important issues and remain relevant? Read it to find out what the insiders say, and for more information on the battle in Harry with his family, checkIt's the only thing Prince Harry wants to return from the royal family.

Read the original article onBetter life.

The official response of the palace to theTimeThe video, which has not mentioned Meghan, was the following: "The Duke is not a member of the royal family and the comments it made are made in a personal capacity." Although it is true, Harry and Meghan are no longer from the senior royals, they are probably the main members of the profile of the royal family. Although they may not have their royal status, they haveStardom International-And they clearly intend to continue to take advantage of their celebrity to promote social and political causes.

On November 3, Meghan made headlines as the first member of the British royal family to vote in an American election. But just one day before, a spokesman for the couple told an initiate that their word does not end once the election is over. "Part of an active member of society is to participate in the democratic process," said the couple representative. "So encouraging people toget involved in politics is something that is important. "And for more last time with these formal royals, checkSignal Harry and Meghan, they may be ready to give up their royal titles.

The queen never voted at the U.K. During his 68-year-old reign, although she hasencouraged the voting in the past. The Buckingham Palace website explains its abstention in this way: "By convention,The queen does not vote Or to support elections, but his Majesty presents important ceremony and ceremony roles for the U.K government. "

Interestingly, the British law does not bathe the royals of the vote. "The queen can vote, but in practice it'sconsidered unconstitutional for the monarch to vote In an election, "the American parliament said. It's simply a long-standing tradition that the Queen and the whole royal family, includingPrince Charles andPrince William, second and third online respectively - joined for centuries. And for knowing that goes up like the most popular member of the monarchy, checkThis British royal is now more popular than the queen, the new survey.

ANewsweek Revealed surveyThe silence of the queen on black life counts (While Harry and Meghan were pretty vocal in their support) has a shared opinion to the U.K. With the majority of young people who believe that the monarch should talk about the question.

While Her Majesty has never shared his views on political issues, her heirs, knowing that they need the support of the Millennials, can consider a new touched fighter approach. And for more on what is then for his majesty, checkWhy Queen Elizabeth could consider going down, says the insiders.

Charles' activism on environmental issues such as climate change has been dug the edge of the policy for decades and the prince has collected the criticism for this reason even in the past. Today he isrented for his warnings involved And is more passionate than ever to support green causes. In a new interview with BritishVogue, Charles implored global leaders and individuals to act so we could "Secure our disaster world. "And for the drama in the midst of the fictitious representation of this royal, checkWhy the Queen could be upset by the west of Dominic to play in Prince Charles.

For its part, Prince William, who has become more and more vocalous to save the environment, has recently launched the Earthshot Prize, an initiative of the Royal Foundation to "encourage change andhelp repair our planet Over the next ten years - a critical decade for the Earth. The Foundation's website says the project was inspired byPresidentJohn F. Kennedy's Moon shot With "simple but ambitious goals for our planet who, if realized by 2030 will improve life for all of us, for future generations". And for the last controversies surrounding the battle of the prince with coronavirus, discoverWhy could the COVID diagnosis of Prince William spell a disaster for the royals.

"It could be the moment when the royal family needs to re-evaluate the way they remain relevant," said a royal initiateBetter life."They will never vote, but maybe there is something to won by looking at Harry and Meghan's game game without rewriting the entire script. The world changes and the royals understand that they have to change With her for the monarchy to survive. " And for more information on another former family member who has changed him from within, here's13 incredible ways Princess Diana changed the royal family forever.

Diane Clehane is a journalist and author of New YorkImagine Diana andDiana: the secrets of his style.