Good Lifestyle

The continuation betweenMeghan murder and the tabloidMail Sunday warms new explosive claims. The Duchess of Sussex continued the newspaper publisher in October 2019 on their decision to publish a letter that she wrote to her father,Thomas Markle, after his wedding 2018 atPrince Harry. Now, as the legal battle reaches his mark of one year, theTaboid alleged that the duchess "has no reasonable expectations of privacy," saying that she and Harryworked with the authors of the recent redemptionFind freedom "To put their version of the events through the book." In short, publisher's lawyers say that Meghan is not concerned about the details of his life that arrives in the light, as long as they are "favorable and flatterers towards her".

Earlier this week,Mail Sunday has won an offer of useFind freedom As part of hisDefense against Meghan's Privacy Claim. JudgeFrancesca Kaye gave the associated newspapers Ltd., publishers ofMail Sunday, permission to change his defense to add "other details" relating to the book, published in August.

In a new depot, the associated newspaper lawyers allegeHarry and Meghan "cooperate" withFind freedomauthors,Omid Scobie andCarolyn Durand. They claim that the sussexes "allowed the authors to observe them and interact with them, their friends and their associates, and allowed their friends and associates to speak and transmit information to the authors." The deposit also indicates that Meghan "does not obey the details of his personal relationships and his publicly disclosed correspondence, provided that it is formed in terms that are favorable and flattering to it."

The extent of theInvolvement of the sussexes with the book has been the subject of a dispute. Earlier this year, before the publication ofFind freedom,The publisher promoted the Tell-All With the affections, the authors received "unique access". They stated that the book was "written with the participation of those who closer to the couple" and promised that would reveal "details unknown toThe life of Harry and Meghan together, dissipating the many false rumors and ideas that afflict the couple on both sides of the pond. "

While Harry and Meghan did not dispute the allegations of the publisher at the time, they have since said, through their spokesman, theydid not collaborate with the authors. In September, Meghan's lawyer described the anecdotes inFind freedom as "extremely anodyne, the product of the creative and / or inaccurate license."

Court documents for the prosecution between Meghan andMail Sundaylisting49 The details they claim prove Meghan and Harry gave information to theFind freedom authors. The list includes descriptive passages from the book on the trips of the couple in Africa; Meghan's personal correspondence with his mother,Doria Ragland; Meghan's thoughts after the meetingQueen Elizabeth for the first time; And the revelation about who said "I love you" first (it was Harry). Tabloid lawyers emphasize that several photos of the book came from the Instagram of Couple Now Inactive, @sussexroyal, noting the publication of these images has irritated the couple in the past. "It is deduced that Meghan allowed permission to republish these images in the book," says tabloid lawyers.

RELATED:For more information up to date, sign up for our daily newsletter.

Some legal experts and some insiders of the palace believe that all this rehabilitation of Harry and MeghanGrievances against the royal family and the media Just dragging the couple in their unhappy past - and it could even damage their reputation in the future.

London-based lawyerMark Stephens RecountNewsweek, "If I advised Meghan, I would say going out now. The risk is thatHow does it curate its reputation, what it allows the public domain and what it does not do it, are now things that will be picked by lawyers in cross-examination. The stakes are enormous because when his reputation is not damaged particularly. "

If the trial goes ahead, Meghan is also confronted with the possibility of testifying his father before her. "It would be disastrous," said an insider palaceBetter life.

The trial was not without other disappointments for the duchess already. In May, theThe judge denied the allegations of MeghanDealhonesty and alleged malice from the tabloid, deciding that they are irrelevant for its lawsuit in terms of law and precedent.

"Given the level of detail in the book, it is difficult to imagine that none of that came from the duke or duchess," said my source. "In both cases,Find freedomMany eyebrows were raised from the pretension of sussexes to want to keep their private lives. If Meghan really wants to protect his privacy, the best action plan may be to remove the trial and not look back. And for more juicy details on these old royals of work, check 3 other Royal Tell-All explosives who launched a new light on Harry and Meghan .

Diane Clehane is a journalist and author of New York Imagine Diana and Diana: the secrets of his style .