Good Lifestyle

If you are looking to lose a few kilos, the common opinion would dictate that you simply count calories. The general practice says that a woman must eat 1,500 calories a day to lose a book a week and a man can have up to 2,000 calories a day for the same result. But a new study,Published inJama Tuesday, assert that calorie count is not the key to weight loss at all.

The randomized clinical trial of $ 8 million monitored weight loss efforts of 609 overweight and non-diabetic adults over a year. Half of the participants were placed on a low fat diet and the other half was put on a low carbohydrate diet, the intention to assess which was more effective. Both schemes were composed of healthy foods, although different types. The low-fat group to eat brown rice, barley, safety oats, and other foods that were to be avoided by the small carbohydrate group, which consumed rich foods In fat such as lawyers, olive oil and nuts. They are not obliged to complete no exercise quota, and there was a limit on calories.

While most people have lost between 11 and 13 pounds, the results revealed that there was no significant difference in weight change for one or other of the groups, so it seems that few carbohydrates (The healthy type) can be just as efficient and low in bold to lose weight. . What the study involved, however, was that "healthy eating" one or the other form is sufficient to lose weight even if you do not count calories. It also doubts the belief that some people are simply better to digest certain foods than others because of their genes,a trend that caused a tip in genetic tests for custom diet plans, As the genotypes of the volunteers did not seem to think about the effectiveness of one or the other regime.

Christopher D. Gardner, Director of Nutrition Studies at Stanford Prevention Research Center and Senior Author of the Study, says the two regimes were partly because the subjects were released from calorie count constraints, Which led them to develop a more healthy relationship with food. "A few weeks on the study, people asked when we were going to tell them how many calories to reduce," GardnerRecountThe New York Times. "And months in the study, they said," Thank you! We had to do it so many times in the past. "

"We really stressed the two groups and again that we wanted they ate high quality foods," he added. "We told them that we wanted us to minimize added sugar and refined grains and eat more vegetables and whole dishes. We said," Do not go out and buy a low fat brownie simply because That said weak in bold. And these low -carb chips - do not buy them because they are always chips and play the system. ""

The bottom line is: eat healthy and keep the proportions sensitive! And if a mathematical approach calls on you, you may want to tryJames McAvoy of the macronutrient counting system instead of calories.

To discover more incredible secrets about the life of your best life,Click hereRegister for our free daily newsletter!