Here is the secret reason that companies make you work from "9 to 5"
Blame on the legal profession.
At today's day and age, the workday of 9 to 5 will quickly become obsolete, largely thanks to technology. The ability to work from anywhere has its disadvantagesMore particularly, the rise of "travalcation"-But the major advantage is that it allows you to get the job without being stuck to a fluorescent cab on. It's definitely a good thing, since studies have shown that working outsideThe boundaries of an office space make people happier and have the advantages of major health.
Studies have also shown thatIndependent people tend to be more satisfied with their lives Despite all the concern not to have a fixed salary, mainly thanks to the flexibility of their schedules. If you have a job that requires many interactions with other people, maintaining a defined planning is logical because you need to set meetings at one-hour mutually practical. But if you are valued mainly on the basis of your exit, the speed with which you fill in a project is much more important than when you do it and you take it eight hours or four. In these cases, a calendar from 9 to 5 does not really make sense, and it mainly encourages employees to fall behind their workload because there is no apparent reward in place so that something be done earlier.
So where do old 5 to 5 years come from? Why is not it 7 to 3, or 10 to 6?
Many people know that the 9 to 5 working days have been introduced by the Ford Automobile Company in the 1920s and became standardized byThe Fair Labor Standards Act in 1938 as a way to try to curb the operation of the factory workers. But few people know the story of why we act as it makes sense to pay people according to the time they spend at the office, as opposed to the actual amount of work they produce.
In fact, the concept of billable hours took place in the 1950s to stimulate the wages of lawyers whose range of wages did not correspond to those of doctors. In 1958,An article ABA argued thatSince lawyers have received fixed fees for their services, they did not attach enough money in exchange for all the time spent working with customers. The concept of billable hours appeared as a means of allowing lawyers to earn money from every minute that they spent working, and by the 1970s, the approach had become the norm.
Law firms quickly started to realize that they could earn much more money by making their employees longer. In 1958, lawyers had to work around 1300 hours a year, which translated only 27 hours a week. Today, many of the quotas are as high as 2200 hours a year, which translates to about 45 hours a week.
This time-is-artwork approach quickly caught fire with other industries, which is why we still live in a world in which we evaluate an employee largely over how long they spend at their offices. The problem, of course, is that in salaried positions, you are not actually paid for the time you spend working. So, employees feel under pressure to stay late to show their bosses that they are attached to their jobs.
In this sense, the irony of the modern work day is that it now contradicts its original goal, which was to eradicate the exploitation of workers.
A lot of my friends enter the office at 9 o'clock and leave late in the evening, because they want to impress their boss and answer all the emails that their employer sends, whether or not they are during working hours , resulting in a new generation of people who feel somewhat dissatisfied, overloaded and underpaid.
There are actions that states take to limit this regarding the trend. Back in March, the city of New York introduced a bill that would actually make it unlawful for companies to contact employees outside office hours.
"There is a lot of New Yorkers who do not know when their day of work begins or when their workday ends, because we are all so related to our phones"Espinal RafelThe Brooklyn Council member who introduced the bill, saidWCBS. "You can always work, you can always talk to your boss, but that just says that when you want to hit your boiling point and you can not do it anymore, you can not decompress and decompress for some time."
In addition, other countries are experimenting with encouraging their employees to advance their work more quickly in order to have more free time. In July, a New Zealand company tried to reduce the work week of 40 hours a week at 32 years old and found that the new planning made their employees more productive and motivated.
"Supervisors said the staff was more creative, their presence was better, they were on time, and they did not leave long breaks," Jarrod Haar, Human Resources Professor at Auckland University of TechnologyRecountThe New York Times. "Their actual work performance has not changed at the end of four days instead of five days."
Sweden has also experienced With the implementation of shorter work days with excellent results. AndA recent study have found that while 40% of US adults work 50 hours or more a week, they generally only spend 3 hours a day doing real work, directing researchers to conclude that "cutting hours could improve productivity In the United States as long as companies abandon the 8-hour mentality. "
If you are an employer, it is really worth re-examining whether or not your employee is based on how long they go to their offices are actually beneficial for the financial growth of your business. And if you are an employee, this could be helpful to discuss these facts with your employer to strengthen your productivity. And for more scientific research on how modern work day affects our mental health, checkWhy you should always take all your holidays.
To discover more incredible secrets about the life of your best life,Click hereTo register for our free daily newsletter!