Good Lifestyle

Despite disease control centers and the prevention prevention recommendation (CDC) to carry them to help slow down the propagation of coronavirus, face masks have become a divisional subject in the country. But with COVID-19 cases, sucking again, health leaders urge more Americans to comply. Some states, like California and North Carolina, have evenmade them mandatory. Now a new study says thatNational National Mask MandateCould make 15% more people wear masks.

The study, conducted byJan Hatzius,Daan Struyven, andIsabella Rosenberg, aEconomist team of Goldman Sachs Investment Company, reported a basic estimate that determined that a national masque mandate would increase the use of the 15% mask and cut the dailyNew cases growth close to one percent. Currently, only 14States have official mask requirements: New York, Connecticut, California, North Carolina, Nevada, Washington, Kansas, New Mexico, Massachusetts, Delaware, Illinois, Rhode Island, Maine and Michigan.

"We start by showing that a national mandate would probably increase the use of the face mask significantly, especially in states such as Florida and Texas, where masks remain largely voluntary to date," wrote the researchers in their report.

According to the report,The use of the face mask varies considerably Across the country. In the Northeast, where coronavirus figures have improved considerably in recent months, the use is higher than it is in the Southwest, where the number of new cases has gradually climbed. For example, a Yugov survey commissioned by the investment firm revealed that only about 40% of Arizona's surveyed people say "always" wearing face masks in public, while nearly 80% Massachusetts are still saying.

RELATED:For more information up to date, sign up for our daily newsletter.

Goldman Sachs says the mandate would not only want to help the point of view of national health, but also an economy. Investors would have worried about state-of-the-art cases and the potential of "Large lock renewed"will have negative effects on GDP. Researchers say the country could promulgate a national mask mandate instead of promulgating another set of locks, which already costs a 17% decrease in GDP in the United States. The economists of Goldman Sachs..

"If a face mask mandate significantly reduces coronavirus infections, it may be useful not only from a public health point, but also from an economic perspective, as it could substitute for renewed lockers that would strike. Otherwise GDP, "wrote the researchers.

According to their research, this national mandate would prevent the country from coping with a success of five percent in GDP, whichwould save the country 1 trillion dollars, reportedStrong. However, even with health benefits and economic benefits, a national mask mandate can bring, is it likely to be issued?

"This is uncertain, partly because the masks have become a political and culturally charged problem," wrote the researchers. "However, even in the absence of a national mandate, national and local authorities could well expand mandates so as to finally imitate the impact of a national mandate. Our analysis suggests that the economy could benefit from such movements , in particular when in relation to the alternative of a return to larger locks. "And for more on this subject, checkThese were the first states to mandate masks. Here's how they do.