Why temperature controls are "do more harm than good," says the doctor
This COVID security measure is more for the show than to effectively protect everyone from the disease.
The Covid-19 pandemic has forced the government officials and business owners to go very far to try to control the spread of the virus. And while masks, hand washing, and social distancing have all revealed very effective in preventing the spread of the disease, other methods, it is, are more for the show. This includesTemperature controlsWho, according to a doctor, in fact "could do more harm than good,"thanks to the false sense of safety they provide.
even thoughFront-sweeping thermometers without contact can be becoming a more common spectacle these days, they really serve to put your mind dangerously at ease,James Hamblin, MD, written forAtlantic. "The practice is a bit like spraying on the sides of the buildings, to shower football players by hand disinfectant, or a deep cleaning an office carpet," Notes Hamblin. "These things can make us feel safer, but they can not keep us safe if they make us really lower our guard. »
Temperature control are the current standard for admission to school everywhere or office building at a courthouse or on board a flight. But, as Hamblin said on, there is little evidence that they are useful for stopping CVIV-19 spread. It is largely because the symptoms can vary considerably from one patient to another and many people infected with coronavirusmay not have made a fever.
A recent article published in the journalTravel medicine and infectious diseasesfoundTemperature controls are particularly unreliable among a younger population. Researchers estimated 84 men with COVID-19 with a median age of 21,temperatures Twice a day for two weeks from the day that each patient was diagnosed. With one exception, none of the patients had fever for more than three days. In fact, 83 percent of patients ever evaluated a fever at all.
Enlargement Even demography, it has been proven that fever is not always a symptom in Covid-19 patients. An July study in the Centers for Disease Control and the Prevention Journal (CDC)Weekly Morbidity and Mortality Reportrevealed that 20 percent of 164 Covid-19 symptomatic patients, whose median age was 50,did not have a fever.
RELATED:For more information up to date, sign up for our daily newsletter.
Other experts dispute the fact thathigh temperature can not be the result of coronavirus. A long list of questions, including all influenza health and food poisoning with Crohn's disease and sunburn, could be the cause, which means that temperature controls could very well put people who n 'have not Covid-19,Bruce Lee Y., MD, written forStrong.
These factors led to a debate as to whether theTemperature verification Now common does what it is supposed to do. "There has never been a data to show that it is prevented from [COVID-19] transmission,"Eric Topol, MD, Executive Vice President of Scripps Research, saidScience. "Thetemperature control is worthless. It should be abandoned ".
Hamblin accepts, writes:. "If people are reassured by a control of fever and compromise on the basis-wearing a mask, distancing, to wash your hands, they put themselves and others at risk this test does not have the capacity to People reassure, but a real ability to mislead ".
Even the CDC, which makes business owners squarely dissuade fromusing temperature controls, Argues that they do not provide sufficient protection. Their general guidelines warn that "screening and health checks are not replacing other protective measures such as social distance. And to find out more about why your experience with coronavirus can be different from others, seeAccording to Dr. Fauci this can already be assured your safety of COVID.
