The closure of these places to stop Covid can do the opposite, the study of Yale says
A yale study revealed that the closure of these companies could be counterproductive.
Most Americans have spent a large part of the end of the winter and the beginning of the spring of 2020 in the complete lock, with all non-essential stores and many out-of-the-class activities. Although we have long believed that mask masks, home stay orders and social distance are what we need to do with the pandemic, new research prove that all these Covid security measures are not created equal. The recent study of Yale's management school has revealed thatA few precautions have been helpful in mitigating the propagation of the virus, others were not, andSome policies were even prejudicial. According to researchers, the closure of some companies to stop the propagation of the virus has had the opposite effect, resulting in an increase in the death of Covid. To see which business closures have caused counter-productive results, read it and see what other practices we can abandon, discover whyThese 2 precautions of COVID may not be necessary after all, a new study finds.
The closure of some low-risk retail stores was counterproductive.
The study, which was published on November 10, examined the policies of several counties across the country - includingCommands at home, Mask mandates, capacity limits on gatherings andclosingParks and different types of companies - to see what prevented or not prevented the deaths of COVID from March to November.
While closures were intended to stop the propagation of the virus, the study identified several companies that had the opposite effect when they are closed. "The closure of low-risk retail companies such as bookstores and clothing stores have come withhigher growth rate of death, "According to a declaration of researchers. This means that with time, the percentage of death has grown while these policies were in place. It was probably because it has pushed citizens raised towards higher risk activities. , like spending time inside with friends, "specializing researchers.
One of the co-authors of the study,Matthew Spiegel, PHD, professor of finance and superior education director in Yale School of Management, added that "you should always pay attention to what the compromises are because if you turn off one thing, people then engage in another activity . " Spiegel saidBetter life That "closing retail stores (shops, furniture stores and other small businesses that were generally open during the first reopening phase), as well as spas, were counterproductive." And for more information up-to-date discounts directly in your inbox,Sign up for our daily newsletter.
The limitation of gatherings at less than 100 people also seemed counterproductive.
Limit the gathering 100 guests was another "harmful policy" distinguished by researchers. It is possible that this measure "can have the involuntary consequence of making people feel too comfortable to invite more than 99 of their nearest and most expensive". On the other hand, the study revealed thatLimit gatherings 10 people help reduce the growth rate of COVID's death. And to see what new precaution you will have to take now, discover whyThe CDC requires you to do this from today.
Masks mandates were particularly effective in reducing COVID mortality rates.
"Among the policies that have reduced mortality growth rates were general mask mandates, mask mask mandates, home residence orders, limiting gatherings to 10 people and the closing of restaurants , gymnasiums and parks and beaches, "according to the declaration of researchers".
While all theseThe measures have been proven to help, researchers noted a simple take away. "Although many available interventions work, masked mandates are distinguished by their effectiveness and relative lack of economic compromises." The other co-author of the study,Heather E. took, PhD, Professor of Finance in Yale School of Management, stressed that "mandatory mask policies appear to be as effective as higher policies." To see which mask you should avoid, discover whyThis type of facial mask is "unacceptable", warns the Mayo Clinic.
Researchers hope to help decision-makers understand the benefits and falls of different COVID security measures.
"One goal of our study was to help policymakers to discern the benefits of closing various sectors of activity on COVID deaths," said SpiegelBetter life. "We were hoping that it would leave government officials to continue to open these companies whose closure offers very few benefits or worst increases the growth of Covid deaths." And for another measure that does more harm than good, checkThe only thing you can stop doing to avoid Covid, says CDC .
