The 25 United States with the best drinking water
Where tap water is better than anything you can buy at the store.
Tap water gets a rap of bum. Of course, there are some places where the maintenance and failure of the government or neglect have made dangerous drinking water (see: Flint, Michigan), but tap water in most cities is Perfectly perfect. In fact, with a demanding quality control and state-of-the-art filtration systems, you will find that it is as good as the things you normally get in a plastic bottle.
This is especially the case with water in these 25 premises. This is true: we dug into the data and classified the 25 cities of America (on the 200 largest) with the cleanest drinking water. So read it and stay hydrated! And for a list containing the Flip-side, here is the25 cities of America where you may want to consider drinking bottled water after all.
Our methodology:Our data includes areas with the lowest "pollution potential" provided by the Environmental Protection Agency; the smallest number of contaminants in local water, according to the Environmental Working Group; and theAmerican Water Works Association"The best of the best" drinking water tests (determined by water experts and industry leaders). Note: A city does not have to look for its water from a natural spring or a virgin river to have great drinking water, but it must have to taste well and have low levels of contaminants.
25 Macon, ga
Best of the best victories over the last five years: 1
Number of contaminants: 7
Other contaminants detected: 10
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 19
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 19
Clean water note: 85.62
24 Pembroke Pins, FL
Best of the best victories in the last five years: 0
Number of contaminants: 3
Other contaminants detected: 8
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 12
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 4
Clean water note: 85.84
23 Salem, or
Number of contaminants: 3
Other contaminants detected: 7
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 34
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 22
Clean water note: 86.44
22 Memphis, TN
Number of contaminants: 2
Other contaminants detected: 9
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 18
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 24
Clean water note: 86.58
21 Philadelphia, PA
Best of the best victories over the last five years: 1
Number of contaminants: 7
Other contaminants detected: 9
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 8
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 29
Clean water note: 86.63
20 CAPE Coral, FL
Number of contaminants: 5
Other contaminants detected: 3
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 12
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 4
Clean water note: 86.84
19 Oakland, CA
Number of contaminants: 2
Other contaminants detected: 9
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 11
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 1
Clean water note: 86.88
18 Wood, id
Best of the best victories over the last five years: 1
Number of contaminants: 5
Other contaminants detected: 12
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 43
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 23
Clean water note:87.34
17 Olathhe, KS
Best of the best victories over the last five years: 1
Number of contaminants: 5
Other contaminants detected: 12
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 39
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 16
Clean water note: 87.45
16 New Orleans, the
Number of contaminants: 3
Other contaminants detected: 6
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 29
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 13
Clean water note: 87.58
15 Augusta, GA
Best of the best victories over the last five years: 1
Number of contaminants: 7
Other contaminants detected: 8
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 19
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 19
Clean water note: 87.62
14 Orlando FL
Number of contaminants: 3
Other contaminants detected: 6
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 12
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 4
Clean water note: 87.84
13 HAYWARD, CA
Number of contaminants: 3
Other contaminants detected: 5
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 11
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 1
Clean water note: 89
12 Joliet, he
Number of contaminants: 2
Other contaminants detected: 7
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 10
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 2
Clean water note: 89
11 Aurore, co
Best of the best victories over the last five years: 1
Number of contaminants: 4
Other contaminants detected: 11
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 38
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 31
Clean water note:90.31
10 Baltimore, MD
Best of the best victories over the last five years: 1
Number of contaminants: 3
Other contaminants detected: 13
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 7
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 35
Clean water note: 90.58
9 Warren, MI
Number of contaminants: 3
Other contaminants detected: 3
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 13
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 18
Clean water note: 90.69
8 Cincinnati, oh
Number of contaminants: 2
Other contaminants detected: 5
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 6
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 11
Clean water note: 90.83
7 Miami, FL
Best of the best victories over the last five years: 1
Number of contaminants: 4
Other contaminants detected: 11
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 12
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 4
Clean water note: 90.84
6 Port Saint-Lucie, FL
Best of the best victories in the last five years: 0
Number of contaminants: 2
Other contaminants detected: 4
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 12
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 4
Clean water note: 92
5 Savannah, GA
Best of the best victories over the last five years: 1
Number of contaminants: 5
Other contaminants detected: 7
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 19
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 19
Clean water note: 93
4 Charleston, SC
Best of the best victories over the last five years: 2
Number of contaminants: 7
Other contaminants detected: 10
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 21
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 32
Clean water note: 96
3 Louisville, Ky
Best of the best victories over the last five years: 2
Number of contaminants: 6
Other contaminants detected: 10
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 27
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 27
Clean water note: 98
2 Tallahassee, FL
Best of the best victories over the last five years: 2
Number of contaminants: 4
Other contaminants detected: 9
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 12
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 4
Clean water note: 103
1 Sioux Falls, SD
Best of the best victories over the last five years: 2
Number of contaminants: 2
Other contaminants detected: 6
EPA ranking of number of manufacturing facilities / sq. Mile: 45
EPA rank of the total farm AG. Chemical expenditure: 21
Clean water note: 110
For more advice on life better life,am we on facebookandSign up for our newsletter now!