Good Lifestyle

The two women broadcast a video on the online video sharing platform, saying that Ms. Macron had undergone an operation to change her sex at the age of 18. The accusations have been described as absurd and wacky, as no evidence was advanced to support them. However, Ms. Macron continued women in court for violation of her private life and her image rights. Against all expectations, the court ruled in favor of the accused. We tell you.

A story of cultural war

The charges against Brigitte Macron were described as explosives and caused a shock wave. However, the two women who made these allegations did not present any real evidence to support their claims. Their only asset put forward? One of them claims to be an independent journalist, while the other claims to be a medium. The affirmations were considered to be part of the cultural wars which were also present in American policy.

In the middle of the electoral campaign

French President Emmanuel Macron won the French presidential elections in 2022. However, before the elections, those who hated Macron did everything to dirty his reputation and that of his family, including that of his wife. It is therefore not surprising that these eccentric statements occurred in the middle of the electoral campaign, where political opponents seek to discredit their adversaries and their families. In this case, Ms. Macron accused the two women of violating her image rights and having invaded her private life.

A case not so solid

The lawyers of Ms. Macron considered this case as a solid affair. However, the court's decision was the opposite of what they expected. The accused pleaded the right to propose theories on eminent public figures, and the first lady is one. The court finally ruled in favor of the accused.

A heated debate on freedom of expression

This case aroused a debate on freedom of expression and defamation in France. The court's decision was considered surprising, because it defended the right to propose theories on eminent public figures. However, this does not mean that defamation is authorized in France. Public defamation can still lead to legal proceedings.

A surprising motif

The court ruled in favor of the two accused Youtubers and said that the First Lady should have accused them of public defamation instead of accusing them of violation of her image right and privacy.

This decision of the court is surprising but it is with it that the First Lady will have to turn the page. No one doubts it if another case like this came to see the light of day, Brigitte Macron will not repeat the same mistake twice.