Good Lifestyle

Viewers connect to Shark aquarium To see if the entrepreneurs will conclude agreements with rich investors who could make the success of their companies and change their lives. However, fans generally do not see what is happening later, including the small impression of these offers and the competitors of commercial relations are formed with the shark that chooses them. These collaborations are not always revealed for the best, because the current legal situation involving Shark aquarium star Daymond John and competitor Al "Bubba" Baker , which appeared in the program in 2013.

John just obtained a permanent prohibition prescription against Baker when a judge agreed that the owner of the barbecue company and his family caused "incalculable" damages with their comments to the press and publications on social networks throwing the investor. Read the rest to discover how their relationship has embittered and what the prohibition order means for the future.

In relation: The anchor of Fox News "regret profoundly" comment in the air: "I sincerely apologize".

Baker met John when he presented his business in season 5 of Shark aquarium In 2013. He founded the back of Bubba Dossan Baby after opening the Bubba's Q restaurant in Avon, Ohio. As indicated by the Los Angeles Times ,, John has invested $ 300,000 For a part of 30% of the company. It depended on Baker to find a license agreement with a meat processing company.

The company seemed on the way to success at the start. In 2017, Delish reported that He had $ 16 million in sales And was sold in stores, on QVC and at Yankee Stadium. There was also an agreement with the fast food chain Carl's Jr.

"You can't even put a number on what he has done for the company," said Baker's daughter Brittani Bo Baker said Delish de John. "It looks more like a family than a partner. Everything we need, there are no questions asked."

Baker, a former NFL player, told the publication: "My daughter and I are huge dreamers. We all believe that everything is possible if you believe. And we believe."

In May 2023, Baker and Brittani told a very different story at the Los Angeles Times . They said they had only received $ 659,653, - four percent of the media revenues from their business. They also said that John and his associates I tried to resume their business And hold them back money. The father and the daughter declared that their agreement with John had been modified in relation to what had been presented in the air, which, according to the article, is not uncommon. They called the experience "a nightmare". Baker said he had closed his restaurant, was to sell his house and had his vehicle possess.

"I have reconciled with that, and I don't care what it looks like," Baker told the newspaper. "I care about the truth. And many reasons for which I would have been silent was because I looked like a stupid stupid character. I went beyond that. And I am concerned about the other people who come with their American dream. them."

John defended himself in the article. "No matter how disappointed, frustrated or insulted, I can feel for a person or a business, I have registered and stay on Shark aquarium To raise people and give them a chance that I have never had, "said the 54 -year -old man. He also said Baker had generated" important income thanks to the history of the company. We didn't do it and no. ""

The article refers Bénu guilty or guilty of anything. ""

For more information on celebrities delivered directly in your reception box, Register for our daily newsletter .

July 24, USA today reported that John had been granted A permanent prohibition prescription against Baker, Brittani and the wife of Baker, Sabrina Baker , to make derogatory comments about it in the press and on social networks. AE0FCC31AE342FD3A1346EBB1F342FCB

Judge Robert B. Kugler of the New Jersey district court wrote in documents obtained by USA today That the Bakers waged a "social media and media war" against John and caused "irreparable" damage to its reputation.

Kugler described the actions of the bakers as "the unmountained, calculated and virulent attack against John and his reputation is, as we have said in our initial order granting temporary injunctive, unusual relief in his vehemence and persistence." The press release continues: "The amount of reputation damages that the defendants' publications, who have received millions of views and include at least two interviews with major media, are incalculable".

Bakers have been ordered to remove negative publications on social networks on John and are prohibited from making additional derogatory comments on the founder of Fubu.

In relation: The CNN correspondent pulled after a cameraman has run on his foot - now she continues .

Previously, when John obtained a temporary ban order, Kugler judged that the Bakers did not speak of him following a regulation of 2019. As indicated by People , at this moment They agreed not to denigrate John Or another company involved in their business, Rastelli Foods Group. THE Times said Rastelli Foods Group had continued the business bakers and the case was settled.

Now John is happy that the permanent prohibition order has been made. In a declaration at USA today , he said that "decision against bakers, their business and their false statements is a moment of justification ... The real facts, the file and the opinion of the federal judge confirmed that I did not - and I could not have committed a reprehensible act. "

Better life contacted Baker and Brittani, who refused to comment.