Good Lifestyle

There are few actors with a better history than Tom Hanks . THE Oscar -winning star Classics like Save soldier Ryan ,, Forrest Gump , And Big has an impressive filmography and affable behavior that helped him become one of the countries The most appreciated celebrities . You can constantly debate the best performance of Hanks, with choices as eclectic as Cream Philadelphia And History of toy. But what about disappointing entries on its curriculum vitae? We have a clear handle on the superior choices, but it's time to watch the worst movies of Tom Hanks never made.

To do this, we turned to examine the rotten tomatoes the aggregator site, which has a Classified list of each Tom Hanks film . We have traveled the best rated entries and proposed the worst revised films that the actor has ever made. (Note that Rotten Tomatoes ranks using an algorithm, which means that the list is not based solely on the partition, but on the number of criticisms and by criticism.) Read the rest to discover the worst films with one of the best players in the country.

In relation: 8 classic movies that you can't watch anywhere .

Rotten tomatoes Score: 66%

"The problem is not that it is One of the worst films I have already seen in my life; The problem is that it is seven of the worst films that I have never seen in my life stuck at random, their inexorable wickedness amplified by their clumsy juxtaposition, " Calum marshes written for Magazine " .

Rotten tomatoes Score: 65% AE0FCC31AE342FD3A1346EBB1F342FCB

"" Joe's great adventure turns out to be all the blow of a show by a Love boat Replay, " Weekly entertainment critical Owen Gleiberman writing.

Rotten tomatoes Score: 61%

"When you team up Steven Spielberg With Tom Hanks and Catherine Zeta-Jones , expectations are rightly high, "cnn Paul Clinton writing. "But why these three Oscar -winning artists decided to lend their exceptional talents to a film with such A fine bankruptcy of a plot - What is absolutely nowhere - is beyond me. ""

Rotten tomatoes Score: 60%

"But instead of taking the characters seriously, the The film makes the fatal error to take the stand-up seriously. And if you are going to do that, you would better have good material, "wrote Roger Ebert .

In relation: The 10 worst films that were enormous success, the data show .

Rotten tomatoes Score: 58%

"" Volunteers is a Small comedy and completely unshakable It would hardly be worth mentioning without the fantastic entertaining performance of Tom Hanks, " David Nusair wrote for criticism of flies with flies.

Rotten tomatoes Score: 56%

"As a show, The Polar Express seems remarkable , "Club A.V. Keith Phipps writing. "As a film, however, it is the equivalent of a carefully wrapped Christmas gift containing a beautiful new pair of socks."

Rotten tomatoes Score: 54%

"As a gang leader, however, Tom Hanks is ready to be better that the equipment allows him to be ... it's good to see Hanks being silly, and good to see him go wild Jimmy Stewart The kindness that is threatened to overwhelm him by playing bad "Salon Critique Charles Taylor writing. "But this performance should really take off and it lies in the film, a fun bizarre."

Rotten tomatoes Score: 54%

"Even Tom Hanks had to start somewhere, and This Boiteuse Comedy is one of his first works. This is his only attribute, " Bob bloom Written for the Journal and mail (via Rotten Tomatoes).

In relation: The worst film by Julia Roberts of all time, according to criticism .

Rotten tomatoes Score: 54%

"As you expect to Garry Marshall (whose television credits include The strange couple ,, Mork and Mindy , And Happy Days ),, Nothing in common at fun moments, especially between Hanks and Barry Corbin , as a framework of intimidation that hires basket to make advertisements. But a desire to make a big declaration on what is really important in life Takes the film to direct , " Paul Attanasio written for The Washington Post .

Rotten tomatoes Score: 54%

"Tom Hanks plays in A weak comedy About terrible events in a suburban house, " Sisquel gene Written for the Chicago tribune . "The script would like to be a horror film, a comedy and a comment on the suburban life, but it does not reach any target."

Rotten tomatoes Score: 50%

"[Co-Scenarist Dan] Aykroyd's The script has more than its share of Intelligent and full -minded ideas , but the film always feels the need to go down too often Police academy -Style heroes-dress-up-like-Idiots sequences, " Empire 's Kim Newman writing.

Rotten tomatoes Score: 50%

"It is possible to spend almost all Turner and Hooch Say: "Yech !," What is quite the point "," Caryn James written for The New York Times . "The only level on which this Sweet children's comedy The works are like an extended gross joke for eight -year -old children. ""

For more film content sent directly to your reception box, Register for our daily newsletter .

Rotten tomatoes Score: 50%

"But a gag not made a comedy, and if they had spent time on the characters they spent building the house, they could really have had something in The silver pit , "Wrote Roger Ebert.

Rotten tomatoes Score: 47%

"" Hanks, young people Jack Lemmon 80s , is wasted - in the film, he obtains a rhythm with [Jim] Belushi , but until then, he has lost in the middle of the size, " The Washington Post 's Paul Attanasio writing.

Rotten tomatoes Score: 44%

"A fleshy puff of Biphoney-Baloney rises from this extreme incredibly absurd film , a Mawkish fantasy, precious and bizarre of emotional pain, " Peter Bradshaw written for The Guardian .

In relation: Tom Hanks's quarrel with this star is "painful", said friend

Rotten tomatoes Score: 37%

"" Angels proves each bit as inflated and predity as The "Da Vinci Code . However, it is nine minutes shorter than this film, so there is something to be grateful, " The independent 's Anthony Quinn writing.

Rotten tomatoes Score: 37%

"Hanks and Co-Star Julia Robert are stars born - or at least extremely practiced - which serves them here until it becomes obvious that The film has little to go for that Beyond their personal appeal, "wrote Keith Phipps for the club A.V.

Rotten score tomatoes : 29%

"" Well -intentioned work which falls largely flat, it arrives today like any other widget in the "remake" of Disney all! Agenda, whose pedigree offered the hope of something better, " The Hollywood Reporter 's John Defore writing.

In relation: The 30 funniest films of all time and to broadcast them .

Rotten tomatoes Score: 25%

"" Hanks Langdon has no quirk , no context, no history: it is a neutral container for information, a bore of grail hunting, " Dana Stevens wrote for the slate.

Rotten tomatoes Score: 23%

"I left the theater by feeling like the film I had just seen frivolous and poorly traced But in a way charming in his own way, and he moved so quickly that I barely had time to record another hole in the plot before continuing in the following picturesque location, "Vox's Alissa Wilkinson writing.

Rotten tomatoes Score: 22%

"The global effect, although serious, is disjointed, dreary and strangely structured. Apparently unnecessary scenes drag. The characters feel like cardboard cuts , and the story is so deliberately punctuated that she feels tedious, " Claudia Puig wrote for packaging.

Rotten tomatoes Score: 15%

"And that, in the end, is The problem with The circle . He does not see that each story on technology is really a story about people - people who have done so, people who use it, people who need or benefit from it or who are injured, " Angie Han Written for Mashable.

Rotten tomatoes Score: 15%

"What we have here, I think, is a film that will be the most appreciated by those who have not read the Tom Wolfe novel. In its sparkling surfaces and its snapshots, it provides a digestion version in the history of Wolfe, filled with obvious Ironies and easy targets, "wrote Roger Ebert." Those who have read the book will be constantly distracted because they know much more than the film tells them about the characters. ""