Good Lifestyle

Even if it happened over a century ago, the sinking of the RMS Titanic is always an important part of popular culture which remains fascinated by the tragedy which has made more than 1,500 lives. But in the past few days, the ocean lining condemned again made the headlines after a submersible en route to the wreckage site Suddenly lost communications with his support ship. Canadian and American authorities are now trying to locate the ship in the hope of saving the five passengers on board. But as another potential tragedy takes place, the interviews appeared in which the CEO of the underwater company has made alarming comments, in particular that "security is pure waste". Read more to see why some experts were concerned before the last emergency takes place.

Read this then: USPS says it makes these changes to "protect carriers" if you want your mail to be delivered .

Since Titan Submersible disappeared during an expedition on June 18, most of the emphasis was put on the attempted location of the ship and save those on board. But in the process, the potential foreign warning signs concerning the security of the operation also have Come to a meticulous examination While more light is launched on his parent company, Oceangate.

In a November 2022 report covering a previous expedition, CBS News Reporter David Pogue was able to participate in a dive on the famous wreck site. But in preparation for the trip, he noticed a wording concerning the language on the release documents which he was to sign in advance, which claimed: "This experimental ship was not approved or certified by any regulatory body and could cause Physical wounds, emotional or dead trauma. "

During a preliminary visit to the submersible, Pogue also noted that he seemed to have "certain elements of MacGyver Jerry-Riggedness". He underlined the CEO of Oceangate Stockton Rush that the Titan - which claims to be one of the Few ships with human toe This can reach the overwhelming depths of the wreck at around 12,500 feet below the surface - is made from simple and offside materials, including construction pipes as a ballast and a video game controller that is used to pilot the job.

But Rush rejected his assertion that the vehicle was dangerous. "There are certain things you want to be buttoned. The pressure vessel is not at all MacGyver, because this is where we worked with Boeing and NASA and the University of Washington," he explains. "Everything else can fail, your propellers can go, your lights can go. You will always be safe."

But while the CEO has dismissed all concerns about potential danger during most of the conversation, Rush also told Pogue on his Little -known science podcast that the idea of arriving at Discover such risk -free dives was not an option.

"You know, there is a limit. At one point, security is just pure waste. I mean, if you just want to be safe, don't get out of bed," said Rush. "Do not get into your car. Do nothing. At one point, you will take risks, and it's really a question of risk / reward. I think I can do it just as safely by breaking the rules."

After explaining that the Titan has several security measures which should theoretically help avoid any major accident, Rush said that he had persistent concerns for expeditions. "What I am most worried about are things that will prevent me from being able to rise to the surface," he admitted. "Overlooks, fish nets, tangled dangers. And, it's just a technique, the driving technique. It's quite clear: if it's a overhang, don't get out of it. If there is has a net, don't approach. So, so you can avoid them if you are just slow and stable. "

Overall, Rush argued that the operation did not endanger anyone. "I don't think it's very dangerous. If you look at the submersible activity in the past three decades, there hasn't been any major injury, not to mention a death," he declared.

In relation: For more information, register for our daily newsletter .

But despite Rush’s claims that the company has prioritized security, Oceangate has also been criticized for some of its operational decisions. In a blog article on its website from February 2019, the company admitted that it Never had it Titan class , which "normally ensures the owners of ships, insurers and regulators that ships are designed, built and inspected according to accepted standards".

However, Oceangate said that most marine accidents result from an error from the operator and not of mechanical problems. "The simple fact of focusing on the ship's classification does not deal with operational risks," wrote the company. "Maintaining high -level operational security requires constant and committed efforts and a targeted corporate culture - two things that Oceangate takes very seriously and which are not evaluated during the classification."

While Oceangate argues that this has allowed them to avoid bureaucratic administrative formalities, other experts saw it as a red flag . "It suggests that they cut the corners", " Bruce H. Robison , a main maritime biologist at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute in California with a large driving experience in submersibles, said The New York Times .

Others agreed with the evaluation. "I asked three people to ask me to dive on it", " Alfred S. McLaren , a retired naval submarine and emeritus president of the New York Explorers club, told The temperature of the Titan . "And I said," Don't do it. "I wouldn't do it in a million years."

The search for the missing ship - which was confirmed as being on board - continues as American and Canadian authorities comb the area around the Titanic Wreck with specialized planes and boats equipped with Sonar. But the operation is now a race against the stopwatch while the American Coast Guard estimated emergency support systems on the Titan It would only be enough oxygen for passengers blocked for 40 hours more on Tuesday, reports CBS News. AE0FCC31AE342FD3A1346EBB1F342FCB

Early in the morning of June 21, Coast Guard officials reported that listening devices had resumed underwater noise next to Titanic . But as the authorities focus on their research, some experts warn against the difficult rescue operation It awaits us.

"Although the submersible is always intact, if it is deeper than more than 200 m (656 feet), there are very few ships that can become so deep, and certainly not divers", " Alistair Greig , PHD, Maritime Engineering Professor at University College London, told BBC. "Vehicles designed for the rescue of navy submarines certainly cannot go to the depth of the depth of the Titanic . ""