Arm & Hammers detergent contains a "probable human carcinogen", alleges a new trial
The applicant alleges that the products are falsely announced as environmentally friendly.
Arm & Hammer is one of these secular brands on families on generations, first for baking soda and later for personal care, cleaning and linen products . The brand introduced the detergent without phosphate in its range in the 1970s, and in the 80s, Arm & Hammer became the first company To launch detergents with baking soda. Today, the Arm & Hammer detergent is a must for households for many, but if it is on your shopping list, you may want to think twice. A new trial claims that a product contains a "probable human carcinogen". Read the rest to find out more about allegations.
Read this then: The detergent to winning contains a "probable human carcinogen", alleges a new trial .
The trial claims that deceptive marketing tactics are used.
April 3 Akili Charles , a New York resident, filed a complaint Against Church & Dwight Co. Inc., owner of the Arm & Hammer brand. In the trial, Charles declares that the detergent to detergent with the bursting of the arms and the hammer is marketed as being "powerfully clean", "naturally fresh" and "the standard of purity", using a "wave of blue crest "To insinuate cleanliness. AE0FCC31AE342FD3A1346EBB1F342FCB
The trial continues by affirming that these sentences and images are a form of "greenwashing" - a marketing tactic used to make products more respectful of the environment, thus calling on an eco -conscious audience.
Charles notes that research has revealed that Greenwashing is based on "images evoking nature" to call on customer respect for nature, giving them a better impression of the brand as a whole.
But beyond deceptive advertising tactics, Charles' trial affirms that the Arm and Hammer detergent can harm your health.
A harmful chemical is not listed on the packaging.
The trial, which was filed with the American district court for the Oriental District of New York, alleges that the detergent at Rafale Arm & Hammer Clean contains 1.4-Dioxane (Dioxane), which is classified as a "human carcinogen Probable "by the two by the two National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the American Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Dioxane is formed in detergent to detergent due to the addition of ethylene oxide, which reduces skin irritation caused by other ingredients, indicates the trial. The chemical is known to accumulate in the body, with an exposure occurring by inhalation, by consuming contaminated water or by skin absorption, the complaint indicates. This was linked to the liver tumors, the gallbladder, the nasal cavity, the lung, the skin and the breasts.
The chemical product cannot be seen with the naked eye, however, the trial claims that the presence of Dioxane in the ARM and Hammer detergent was confirmed by independent tests by Veritas Bureau last year. Charles also alleges that Church & Dwight Co. "received an opinion and should have been aware of these problems due to third -party complaints", but still fails to list the chemicals on the bottle.
"Despite the claim to purity, the" clean burst "and the bright blue wave, nowhere on the packaging discloses the presence of dioxane," said the costume. Better life Contacted Church & Dwight Co. to comment on the trial, and will update history during the editorial staff.
In relation: For more information, register for our daily newsletter .
Dioxane also threatens the environment.
In addition to the potential increase in your risk of cancer, Dioxane also has harmful effects on the environment, says the complaint of Charles. It contaminates drinking water via these laundry detergents, which are washed in sewers in aquifers that contain groundwater.
Wastewater and septic tanks are not always equipped to filter dioxane, making it "a persistent long -term threat to water resources". New York state has prohibited laundry detergents which exceed a certain level of dioxan, but Charles says that existing damage cannot be canceled.
"Insofar as the product may have made late efforts to prevent dioxane contamination or the derogations sought to continue selling it, just as modifications will not be able to reverse or biodegraded the dioxine already present in the state, "said the complaint.
Arm & Hammer is not the only detergent currently confronted with a backlash.
Charles says that society is guilty of unfair fraud and enrichment, and is also in violation of the Magnuson-Moss Guarantee Act, from New York State Fraud Acts and New York General Business Law.
Allegations are similar to a A separate trial tabled last month. Darlene Hangen-Hall From Buffalo, New York, has filed the collective appeal against Procter & Gamble Company, which manufactures detergents, claiming that the company Greenwashs acquires an original aroma boost - which also contains dioxane.
Procter & Gamble "manufactures and sells a detergent to detergent in the packaging filled with natural elements, such as stylized flowers, leaves, butterflies and" intensive use of the green color "", indicates the trial. However, as with the Arm & Hammer detergent, Hengen-Hall says that the products are in fact distorted due to the presence of Dioxane.
