Good Lifestyle

In the United States, Walmart and CVS are two of themost popular retailers For health necessities, which you need the medicine of cold and free colds (OTC) as winter approaches, or you have a regular daily prescription to collect. But even as a health center for millions of Americans, these two companies are faced with their share of reaction. In fact, Walmart and CVS are now under fire for some of the products they sell. Read more to find out why the two retailers are accused of having "cheated" the buyers of certain drugs.

Read this then:Walmart prohibits buyers from doing so in 4 states, from next year.

The retailers have been criticized for drug practices in the past.

Medicines, whether over -the -counter or on the counter, have serious risks and potential complications, which is why retailers who sell them often find themselves embedded in the controversy. In April, Kroger wastrial Two buyers who claimed that his medication against colds and the flu did not cause drowsiness. This same month, Walgreens and Walmart were prosecutedOn their lidocaine patches, consumers alleging that the two retailers were not as durable or as strong as they claimed.

Now Walmart has been linked to another large pharmacy chain in a new controversy: Walmart and CVS are struck by a lawsuit on the same drug complaint.

Walmart and CVS face the same problem.

On September 30, Reuters reported that the Court of Appeal of the Columbia District hadRelaced two proceedings Against Walmart and CVS for the sale of homeopathic products alongside over-the-counter drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration of the United States (FDA) in stores and online. The court overturned lower land decisions against prosecution from the non -profit center for the investigation (CFI).

"The Court of Appeal of D.C. gave us the opportunity to prove that what the retailers have done is fraudulent, and now it is our work to prove it to a jury," said the CFI legal directorNick Little said in a statement in Reuters.

Better life Contacted Walmart and CVS to comment on the prosecution, but has not yet heard.AE0FCC31AE342FD3A1346EBB1F342FCB

RELATED:For more up-to-date information, register for our daily newsletter.

The proceedings say that the placement of these products is in error the buyers.

In the costumes, CFI affirms that Walmart and CVS are both in error the buyers and violating the law on consumer protection procedures of Washington, D.C. according to legal files, "each complaint allegedly alleged that the placement of products in stores and Online of the defendant, as well as the signaling of the aisle (for example, `` Cold, cough & Flum relief ''), present homeopathic products wrongly as alternatives equivalent to "science based on science" drugs And falsely represent that homeopathic products are effective in treating or relieving specific diseases and symptoms. "

It is not only a violation of the consumer law, but also affects the judgment of customers when buying certain products, according to prosecution. "This investment is deceptive for consumers whocan easily confuse He for scientifically tested products that work proven - that they are not, "said CFI in a press release on September 29.

CFI wants all retailers to stop selling homeopathic products alongside over -the -counter drugs.

Little welcomed the recent decision to reverse the proceedings rejected by the lower courts of D.C. "The Court of Appeal rightly recognized that giant retailers cannot simply refuse responsibility for the way they present what is fundamentally without value, "he said in a statement on September 29. "It is a huge victory for consumers and their right not to be misled."

But CFI must still fight Walmart and CVS before the court for complaints in its prosecution, noted Little. The decision "gave us the opportunity to prove that these retailers fraud consumers," he said. "Now it's up to us to do that."

Walmart spokespersonAbby Williams-Bailey Reuters told Reuters that the company does not agree with the decision of the Court of Appeal to rekindle the pursuit of the CFI against it. "We continue to examine the court's decision and assess our options for an additional appeal exam," she said in an email e-mail. CVS, on the other hand, did not respond.

But Walmart and CVS will probably not be the last companies that deal with this problem. Few told Reuters that the court of appeal's decision "put the drug retailers across the country in the remark that they can be held responsible for the message they send by the way they sign and display Falus alternative doctors ". He added: "Our goal is to ensure that all the retailers stop this false statement."