The surprising reason palace helps "expect Harry's book, say sources

"The events of Harry's life did not take place in a void. There is his truth and there is the truth."


The royal family gets gripped for the worst of anticipation ofPrince Harry Memory, which will be published next year. As an initiate saidBetter life, theThe Book of Duke du Sussex Will surely contain many bombs - after all, "he does not get $ 20 million to play drama" they said. But according to royal sources, that's exactly what some palace employees hope.

In a declaration announcing the release of the book, which will cover the entire life of the Prince of Childhood at the age of childhood, Harry said he was "excited of people to read a first-hand story of [his ] Precise and totally truthful life. " But, as an initiate pointed out, "Harry's life events did not take place in a vacuum. There ishis the truth and there isthe The truth and, as the queen said after the maintenance of Oprah, "Souvenirs may vary".

The memoir can be the perfect time for people behind the walls of the palace to reveal their truth too. According to sources, several old Harry aids andDuchess Meghanare in fact "hurry" to the liberation of the Tell-Volume Volume, that they consider the perfect opportunity to "tell their side of history".

"Harry can have a lot to say, but those who had a first row seat looking at everything unfolding. There were a lot of people around the couple who worked for them here in London who saw how he and Meghan fought for a more Great recognition of the palace and parity with the Duke and the Duchess of Cambridge, "explained a source." They maintained a respectful silence, but can not remember if they are obliged to defend themselves. "

Read to find out why Harry's book can encourage unprecedented statements of old staff and why this book could launch a seismic change from the Royal Protocol.

RELATED:The popularity of Prince Harry has just hit a short time. Here's why, sources say.

Former members of Harry and Meghan staff would have more angry with their "false narrative".

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle
Andrew Milligan - Pool WPA / Getty Images

Write in theDaily mail, Royal ExpertDan Woottonexplained that, even though most of the Royal staff members are bound by confidentiality agreements, including the Official Secrets Act, a group ofEx-Stators working for Harry and Meghan Increasing more and more angry on a "false narrative" on how the Sussex were treated by the institution. Wootton revealed that staff members nicknamed "survivors" and stay in touch to weigh the latest news from the couple.

"Some of these people have been in use for many years and are horrified by the very idea of ​​the secrets of the royal family who is in a book written by Harry," said a sourceBetter life. "They consider it beautiful betrayal and an obvious attempt to take revenge."

The royal rules about remaining silent can be set aside if anything on a book member of the book is reputed "inaccurate".

Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex
Samir Hussein / WireImage via Getty Images

Although most of the royal numbers are obliged to remain silent about what is happening behind the walls of the palace under the law, exceptions could be made if Harry's book information is considered "inaccurate", said an initiate. "The royal family plays fidelity and discretion above all, but it is possible that they can find a way to allow a staff member to get his own version of the same event released," said the sourceBetter life. "It would probably not come directly from that person, but perhaps a friend or family member commented on the defense of that person, who would be considered acceptable."

There is also the possibility that a former employee can seek legal action if the book is perceived to ruin their reputation. "Legal remedies are always available if the book rubs unjustly individual members," said a source in Wootton.

RELATED:The only royal rule the queen now tells Palace aides to break sources.

All that is written about the allegations that Meghan intimidated his staff could be a play changer.

Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex
Karwai Tang / WireImage via Getty Images

Just before Harry and Meghan interview withOPRAH WINFREYAdded into March, there were allegations that Meghan had intimidated two of his former employees.The temperature From London first fled the story in March 2021 thatJason Knauf, which was mentioned as the Director of Communications of Sussexes, presented his conclusions in an email toPrince William Secretary Private,Simon caseIn October 2018, documenting incidents involving two ex-employees of Meghans. They say that the intimidation of the duchess had led them to leave their positions. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex called the allegations and the launch of an official investigation by Buckingham Palace "a smear campaign".

The sunreported on January 20, 2010 that nine Meghan employees would havelet their positions, including two former private secretaries,Samantha Cohen(who has already worked forQueen Elizabeth) andAmy pickerilland two nannies that would be willing to provide evidence in the survey.

Knauf, who now works for Prince William, wrote in his email: "The Duchess seems to have an intention to always have someone in his tourist sites. She intimidates there and seeks to undermine his confidence. We had a report after to have been reported with people who have attended unacceptable behavior towards Y. "

Harry's event version, if included in the book, is sure to differ greatly. "This could cause an unprecedented number of revelations on the business," said a source. "With so many things already open about it, all Harry writes about it, it will suffice to add fuel to a fire rage. The palace may have to adopt a strategy totally different from the manipulation of this as a crisis distinct as a result of the book. "

And for more new royals sent directly to your inbox,Sign up for our daily newsletter.

The palace has already indicated that they will "fight fire with fire".

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle visit the Great Famine sculpture, Dublin, Ireland, in July 2018
ROLLINGNEWS.IE / ALAMY Stock Photo

In June, the tabloid journalists in Great Britain began to askWhen and if the queen had been told that Harry and Meghan named their daughter of firstbornLilibret Diana Mountbatten-Windsor, using his Majesty's childhood nickname. At the time, theBBC reported The queen hadnot I was informed that the name of the baby would be before his birth was announced, pushing Harry to threaten the organization of news with legal action. WhenITV approached the palace to commentThey refused to refuse the version of the BBC events. Initiates toldBetter lifethat the movement was considered a "Warning shot"That the palace would not allow" inaccurate information "or false stories about the royal family to stand up.

When Harry's book is published, there is no reason that will not continue.

"The great irony of all this is that Meghan and Harry wanted to modernize the monarchy and they do not just have the way they expected," said a source. "They have ability to the palace not only" keep calm and continue "but to fight against misinformation and Vendettas meant to slaughter them. If it means finding ways to let people speak on their behalf, it seems that they Be inconformed by what the sussexes have made or plan to do. The book is going to be a watershed moment, but the palace has learned to swim in dangerous waters a long time ago. "

RELATED:This royal "speaks for the queen" on the new Harry quarrel, sources say.

Diane Clehane is a reporter based in New York and author ofImagine Diana andDiana: the secrets of his style.


15 subtle signs that you must visit the dentist
15 subtle signs that you must visit the dentist
The most boring zodiac sign, according to astrologers
The most boring zodiac sign, according to astrologers
The most popular Italian actors in the last 10 years
The most popular Italian actors in the last 10 years