A new study says that most solar screens do not meet the new FDA guidelines
All solar creams are not equal.
Now that we are finally on the point of summer, we all need to recall how important it is towearing a solar screen, including when it is cloudy. In addition to reducing your risk of skin cancer,A sunscreen helps keep from signs of aging... or so we thought. According to a new report of the Environmental Working Group (EWG) obtained byCnn, Most solar screens on the market would not pierce the new potential security guidelines for the administration of federal drugs (FDA).
In February,The proposed FDA Update of its regulatory requirements for most solar products. The proposed guidelines include labeling four ingredients-avobenzone, oxybenzone, oxybenzone, taper and octocrylene (which have been linked to lower testosterone levels in men and short pregnancies in women). -Ausse dangerous after learning that they are absorbed in the bloodstream after only a useful day. (Although additional research should be done to confirm that these chemicals are indeed harmful, it is probably preferable to avoid them until cautious for general use.)
The FDA also proposed to lift the maximum SPF value from 50 to 60 and requiring solar protection with a 15 or over SPF comprises wide spectrum protection. The latter is important, since many popular solar screens offer only UVB shelves but not UVA rays. But too much exposure to one or the other can cause skin cancer, according toThe Mayo Clinic.
In anticipation of these changes, the EWP Consumers Defense Corporation has analyzed more than 1,300 sunset and sports screens, and found thatMore than 60% Of these have not offered sufficient protection against harmful UV rays or contained hazardous chemicals to meet the requirements of the proposed FDA. This figure corresponds to the results ofThe EWG report of last year, which found that two-thirds of the 650 SPF products examined did not provide sufficient solar protection, contained oxybenzone or contained a retinyl palmitate (which could increase the development of cutaneous tumors).
The EWP report - which will be officially published next week - is unique in the sense that it has tested the products according to these main FDA security guidelines for the first time. "Even if we have presented similar results in our front guide, comparing it to the actual proposed standards of the FDA is really strong"Nneka Leiba, who leads the team of healthy life science of EWG, said CNN. "So, the fact that 60% of the market are apparently not judged safe and effective by the FDA is a huge deal."
And for more information how to get the most protection against your SPF products, discoverWhy you apply a fake solar cream.
To discover more incredible secrets about the life of your best life,Click hereTo follow you on Instagram!