The worst cities to live if you want to be fit and healthy
It is more difficult to stay active if you live in one of these American cities, search shows.
It's not a secret that being healthy and active is essential to livea long and happy life. Yet many of us allow a number of obstacles to implement our well-being. Whether the work, family responsibilities or simply a lack of motivation, there is no scarcity of excuses on why you do not always eat right or tomake exercise as much as you should. And what aggravates the worst things are the additional barriers that prevent you from achieving your fitness goals, as it turns out,where you live. Yes, the fact is that some places in the United States are simply more conducive to those of others than others.
At the beginning of 2020, the Weatthub personal finance site analyzed the data of the 100 largest American cities to see who were better for people who were better for people whowanted to live an active lifestyle. To determine their rankings, Wallethub has incorporated 38 key indicators, ranging from average monthly packaging club fees to physically inactive adult ratio. Then they ranked each state on "budget and participation" and "sports and outdoors" to determine the final scores. Here are the 10 worst cities to live if you want to be fit and healthy. And for more information on how you live affects your life, checkHere is how long you are likely to live in each state.
10 Stockton, California
Global score: 29.75
Budget and participation ranking: 80
Sportsman and outdoors: 90
And for places where you are likely to enjoy your life,These are the happiest states of the u..
9 Wichita, Kansas
Global score: 29.75
Budget and participation ranking: 39
Sportsman and outdoors: 100
8 Garland, Texas
Global score: 29.71
Budget and participation ranking: 96
Sportsman and outdoors: 84
And for the most risky locations in the United States to live, checkThe 100 most dangerous cities of America.
7 San Bernardino, California
Global score: 29.43
Budget and participation ranking: 87
Sportsman and outdoors: 96
6 Irving, Texas
Global score: 28.99
Budget and participation ranking: 94
Sportsman and outdoors: 92
And for the regions of the country where people tend to lack motivation, checkThese are the most striking stalls of the US
5 Laredo, Texas
Global score: 28.58
Budget and participation ranking: 99
Sportsman and outdoors: 74
4 Arlington, Texas
Global score: 28.38
Budget and participation ranking: 95
Sportsman and outdoors: 93
And for more useful information delivered directly in your inbox,Sign up for our daily newsletter.
3 Bakersfield, California
Global score: 27.63
Budget and participation ranking: 88
Sportsman and outdoors: 97
2 Hialeah, Florida
Global score: 25.86
Budget and participation ranking: 97
Sportsman and outdoors: 98
1 North Las Vegas, Nevada
Global score: 23.29
Budget and participation ranking: 100
Sportsman and outdoors: 95
