"Danger!" Sclammé for the "shameful" response to power: "one of the worst mistakes I saw"

Fans maintain that the popular competitor Cris Pannullo was misleaded by a bad index.


Dedicated fans of Danger! are not foreign to weigh on controversial elements of their favorite game show. Whether it be Organize Or the behavior of the players, even the most minor light can become very debated subjects on social networks, especially when they involve a popular competitor. In the last dust, Danger! Viewers call a recent response governing "shameful" during a Pivot time for the show .

In relation: Controversial Danger! The player slammed for a "coarse and coarse" remark during the game .

The controversy occurred during a previous phase of the show champions tournament in 2024 (COT). The annual challenge brings back some of the most efficient players to compete against each other for a chance at a price of $ 250,000.

On an episode broadcast on February 26, the previous 21 -day winner and the seeded of the tournament Pannullo cries appeared alongside the three -day winner Jared Watson and six -day winner Ben Goldstein . A answer to a question halfway through the game now attracts attention.

The problem started when Pannullo buzzed $ 1,000 in the "Memory" category. The index was then revealed to be: "By comparing information on computer memory, think before giving us this, the number of mega -cells in a gigabyte."

After a break, Pannullo replied "1,000", which was deemed incorrect by the host Ken Jennings . Watson then buzzed to fly with the answer "1,024", which was deemed correct and gave it control of the board of directors.

Shortly after, fans of the show went to social networks to call what they saw as a confusing index that potentially upset the Pannullo race.

"Absolutely shameful of the Danger! The judges will not accept 1000 for the number of megaoctes in a gigabyte last night "," the user @panchromaticity published in a message on X (formerly known as Twitter), adding that it was "one Worse errors that I have ever seen "in a later response.

While others jumped on the wire to emphasize that "1,000" was always an acceptable response, @Panchromaticity also explained why Jennings was so specific to hold for "1024.

"I did not notice at the time, but they specifically asked questions about memory, and it is true that there is a Jedec standard which defines the kilobyte, mega -typles and gigabytes like 2 ^ 10 bytes, 2 ^ 20 bytes and 2 ^ 30 bytes, respectively, "they wrote. AE0FCC31AE342FD3A1346EBB1F342FCB

Others have joined the conversation, trying to analyze the confused technical semantics involved. One person replied that the distinction was between the decimal and binary terms used to describe the memory unit - adding that the term "mebibyte" would probably have made the index clearer.

Some responded to the initial message to show that they were also distraught from the decision. "It irrationally puts me angry," wrote a fan, while another replied: "Shouting shouting, throwing Rn."

However, others have chosen to subtly defend Jennings' decision. "'Think before giving us this' is quite clearly translated by' we are looking for 1024 and not 1000 '', wrote a user." It's sticky, but I don't mind. "

Unfortunately, Pannullo has never recovered from the wrong answer after giving control of the board of directors. Watson was able to locate all the double daily doubles and accumulate enough money to easily win the match and eliminate the other two players in a shocking upheaval.

The tournament has just reached His last round And will end in a series of best seven.


Categories: Entertainment
Tags: Entertainment / News / TV
By: alberto
8 aspects you didn't know about Emily Ratajkowski
8 aspects you didn't know about Emily Ratajkowski
Dr. Faisci has just said that these 2 things could stop another Overvolt of Covid
Dr. Faisci has just said that these 2 things could stop another Overvolt of Covid
This restaurant and an arcade chain reopen and attempt back
This restaurant and an arcade chain reopen and attempt back