13 reasons why you should be happy not to live in a huge house
Good things come in small packs.
Larger is not always better, especially when it comes to owning a house. Many of us have dreamed of buyinglarger housesBut the reality is that possessing a McMansion is more money and effort that it is worth it. Of course, it sounds good to have an official dining room to accommodate vacation meals and extra guest rooms about these few friends' opportunities and family visit. But finally, these vast spaces come with enormous headache, huge heating bills and large land taxes. Here we have rounded some seriousnessDisadvantages of owning a big house, those you should be grateful you do not have to treat.
1 The heating invoices areDear.
The expenses associated with a large home do not stop once you sound on the dotted line. For example: Every winter, it will cost more to keep your home warm. While a 1,800 square feet house with a heat pump costs about $ 3,000 a year to heat, a 4,000 square feet house with the same heating system costs more than $ 5,400 on average heat, according toPeco Energy Company.
2 Some taxes apply only to more expensive residences.
Never heard about themanor tax? If you are in the Tri-State zone, you are probably not a big fan. The tax, officially known as "Real estate transfer fees, "a 1% tax is charged to any real estate transaction in New York or New Jersey worth more than $ 1 million. It may not seem like a lot, but when you buy an apartment in New York for $ 5 million, while 1 the cent will put you back additional $ 50,000.
3 Property taxes tend to be higher.
Several factors make it possible to calculate how each owner pays in land taxes, many of whom are affected by the pure size of a residence.
"The evaluator takes into account the amount of similar properties sold for, allImprovements or additions You have done at home, how much it would be cost to replace the house and the amount of income you could gain from the property if you rented it, "explainsAmber KeeferofThe nest.
Basically, each habitable room of a home contributes to its perceived value, generally greater homes present more important land taxes.
4 There is more to clean.
This is just common sense, really. The more square area you have, the more surface you will needto clean every week. And not only is this a major disadvantage, but it's also expensive.
An owner with a 2,000 square feet house can get away with cleaning supplies once a month. But if you have a seven-room home, you will need to replenishless Once every week. Of course, people with big houses can probably hire housekeeping, but this is just another expense to add to the list.
5 Repairs are expensive.
According toThe balance financial expertPaula's trousers, An owner is supposed to reserve about $ 1 per square foot per year for emergency maintenance costs.
The owner of a 2,000 square feet house, for example, should be set aside $ 2,000 a year for this emergency fund. The owner of a 6,000 square feet house should save three times more. And this big sum is not even guaranteed to cover the costs completely, to see like other factors, like the age of your home, the climate you live, as well as your location location roles in Potential maintenance costs.
6 They take longer for sale.
Although the biggest houses deserve technically more things, it is also more difficult to exchange them against cold and difficult species. On aNerdwallet Metro Area AnalysisThe 25% of houses appreciated at a faster pace than the most important 25%.
At present, youth millennia with small families and limited funds to spare are a majority of the real estate market, and they simply have no money to allow you extravagant houses.
7 They were wasting from the square.
According to the search for theUniversity of California, Los AngelesMost families - even if they have an area in squares to lose - tend to spend most of their time in the same rooms, namely cooking and family room. Most other rooms, frankly, are only space waste that promotes clutter.
8 It's harmful for the environment.
Student in New ZealandIman Khajehzadehcarried out ato study In 2017, this found that the largest houses can have a negative impact on the environment. Because people only use the same rooms in their home, the energy used to illuminate, heat and cool the washed with the environment unnecessarily to the environment.
"Although decisions in terms of selection of the size of the house seem personally, they can have important impacts on the use of resources as well as the environment," Khajehzadeh explained.
9 You will create more clutter.
People who live insmall houses Can not create too much clutter simply because there is no space for that. People who live in giant houses, however, are another story.
With the storage space in Gogo and the rooms to save, those with large houses are much more likely to waste their money on things they do not need, just because they have the place for that.
10 It's lonely.
It's too easy forfeel that you are alone When there are some 6,000 square feet of empty space surrounding you. Even if you have a family and a spouse, unused rooms and unoccupied spaces will make you feel like something - or someone is missing.
In addition, it is meaning that the family of four in a 2,000 square feet house will probably spend more time together than a family of four in a 7,000 square foot manor. Who leads us to ...
11 There will not be so many family links.
The sad reality is that when children have more room in the house to escape, they will benefit. "The more your family must communicate, the more they go"Graffinate, author ofDo not buy it, explained toRealtor.com. "The actual link moments occur in the corridors or around the island of cooking."
12 The journey is probably worse.
The biggest houses must be located on more land. Where do you find large plots of earth? Not near the municipalities!
More often than not, people who buy big houses end up adding time to their journey. And a few months ofshuttle bus One hour each day can seriously affect its mental health. A 2017to study In the United States, people with trips of one hour or more were more than 33% more likely to suffer from depression.
13 Materialism leads to misery.
People who want others to see that they have a good car, a big house and a fancy hand bag tend to be materialistic. And although there is nothing wrong with escaping on these things for yourself, we can not say as much materialism all.
One of 2018to study published in theFamily newspaper and economic problems found that people who appreciate their property more than their personal relationships often consider that their marriages suffer from result. So, if you want aBig house for the bad reasons, it's probably time to re-evaluate.
To discover more incredible secrets about the life of your best life,Click hereTo follow you on Instagram!