Good Lifestyle

It all started with such a promise, pump and circumstance. WhenMeghan murder The son of Great Britain wife thenPrince Harryit was clear that the "replacement" aged 34 to the heir had finally found love and the bailiff couple in aNew era of modernity in the monarchy. At the time of their commitment November 2017, the American actor aged 36, biracial and married previously, washeraldled as a breath of fresh air In an ancient centuries institution, not exactly known to adopt change. But Meghan was not only married his prince, she married an institution that had survived decades of tumult and scandal, intends to stay relevant to a great social change.

For the 29 million people who monitor, the marriage of the new Duke and Duchess of Sussex on this day without clouds in May 2018 seemed to be a modern day fairy tale. But asMeghan saidOPRAH WINFREY Earlier this month, things were hard for what they seemed to be. During his two hours, TELL-ALL with Oprah two weeks ago, the Duchess said she had the impression of being treated more like a prisoner (she had to give up her passport, her driver's license and her keys) that a princess of "the institution," as she referred, in a way that led her to suicide thoughts. His commentsstrangely resounded those of Harry's mother,princess diana, whose misfortune was bare in his own interview told in 1995. Confessions of Meghans associated with his revelation of the jaw which abandoned a unnamed member of the royal family discussed the color of his skin of his child. To be born (confirmed by Harry, who refused to elaborate anything else) broke the myth that she lived a kind of existence of fairy tales and decimated the reputation of the royal family in the process.

But the insiders of the palace say that the current crisis could have been at least partially avoided if the royals did one thing in particular. "The Royals made the fateful mistake of underestimating Meghan," said an initiateBetter life."She did not grow up in a culture that venerated the monarchy or one who kissed the" steep upper lip "ethics. She said as much whenShe spoke to ITV before everything blew. Meghan wanted to get his side of the story and in doing so, plunged the palace to chaos. Perhaps some of them could have been avoided if the palace had found a mutually beneficial way to maximize Meghan's role in the family. "

Readnow how to know how the bad influence of Meghan has created an unprecedented crisis that shows no starting sign at any time soon, and for more information on the spin-offs of the interview, checkThe only thing William must do to save the monarchy, say insiders.

In October 2019, Meghan and Harry revealed theirfight with life in royal fish For the first time during an interview withTom Bradbyduring an official tour of Africa. Since then, the tensions appeared to build between the aussexes and the royal family. A year after this interview, in which Meghan revealed that she found the royal life "really difficult", British historian and authorRobert Lacey RecountBetter life, "TheThe British monarchy will be less rich If he can not find a way to include talented celebrity but certainly from Meghan and Harry in his future. The prescient remarks of Lacey, which is also the historical advisor toThe crown, prefiguring what has been turned into one of the biggest crises that the royal family has already been confronted.

"When Edward VIII was sent in exile following the 1936 abdication, he published his memoirs, then said that this couple is sent into exile, they will not remain silent," a recounted sourceBetter life. Now, not only the couple speaks, but they also havefriends, likeGayle Roi, speak on their behalf, which raises more questions than answers for the royals and allows Meghan and Harry to control the story.

The couple also specified that even if they have beenstriped their titles and their patronages, their commitment to the public service remains strong. Meghan's work with women's organizations likeSmart workwill continue and although it is now old vice-president ofQueen Elizabeth Commonwealth Trust (Harry was president) andcan not help the crownHis work can continue in the context of Archewell, the Charity Foundation of the Couple. "Meghan was a valuable asset to work with the Commonwealth," said an initiate. "It's really a loss." And for more about what to come for Harry and Meghan this year, checkThe only thing Meghan and Harry really wait impatiently in 2021.

While theRoyals was brewing for the worst Once the announcement of the interview is exit: "They did not know that it would be revealed to be the absolute disaster that it was and continues to be," said an inner source. The courtiers became very worried when it was revealed the two-hour program would mainly consist of aIndividual conversation between Meghan and OprahBut they hoped Harry's comments soak a little bit. That, of course, was not the case.

"Harry added fuel to fire by revealing how much his relationship with his father and brother are now," said the source. "It was an accelerated revelation after the other. Meghan did not hold anything back."

As an initiate pointed out, "if there is no reconciliation that can be achieved, there is no reason to believe that there will be no other television interviews in the line which can only hurt the palace. " And for more revelations of Meghan, checkMeghan finally broke his silence on his sad relationship with his father.

Meghan's racism allegation and Harry in the royal family is "incredibly harmful" to the whole family, explains a source. "By not named the family member who would have raised the question of the skin's skin color, Meghan's doubt and Harry, on the small group of Royals Seniors."

Harry and Meghan were both effusive in their praise from the Queen, but comments on the tense nature ofHarry's relationship withPrince Charles andPrince Williamsuspicion molded on his father and brother (as well asCatherine Duchess andCamilla, Cornwall Duchess) The day after the interview,Oprah revealed onCBS this morning that Harry had told him that neither the queen norPrince Philip had made the wrong remarks.

"FoundryA shadow on the Prince of Wales is very harmful for the very future of the monarchy, as well as the introduction of Prince William into all of this. It's really shame because Cambridge's duke has been so vocal to talk about how racism has no place in the sport, "said an initiate. By descending this road proves that Meghan and Harry" Rigole not, "said the source." They want their concerns to be addressed. TheQueen made a short statement. It does not seem to have done much to reduce controversy. "

The British press always resumes from the idea that the members of the royal family are sitting for an interview told on American television, while in the USGhan, Meghan and Harry are announced to reveal their truth. Meghan and Harry saw their popularity plunge into U.K. Following Megxit (And even more after the interview), but their new international Stardom brand is considered much more favorably in America.

"In the states, the Duke and the duchess of Sussex are huge stars and their disclosures on their problems within the royal family make them much more friendly to the American public than in Great Britain," said a source . "The Royals have no control over the media in America where producers do not have to worry about access if they deploy something that deploy the palace. And they clearly have no control over what say Meghan and Harry. It seems that as if they decided they decided do what to do to be heard. Maybe if [the royal family] had been more conscious of the pain and anger of Sussexes and what would have occurred in the palace, there would have been a way to prevent it from making the public. "And for more new royals sent directly to your inbox,Sign up for our daily newsletter.

In the days following the maintenance of Harry and Meghan with Oprah,#Abolishthonarchy was fashionable on Twitter. This may seem a little stupid that the monarchy is distinguished by a hashtag on social media, but in truth, it is a real threat, because they need the support of the British taxpayers (which partially funded the institution) to survive.

In an editorialThe independentauthor and activistShola Mos-Shogbamimu, PhD, wrote: "TheThe royal family has a lot to answerAnd we deserve a complete answer. And even if people are supporters of the monarchy and our Queen Elizabeth, we must all remember that neither it - nor the institution are irreproachable. They are also responsible for their actions, omissions and failures. And for more information on the future of the institution, check Can the monarchy survive without Queen Elizabeth?

Diane Clehane is a journalist and author of New York Imagine Diana and Diana: the secrets of his style .