Good Lifestyle

The news thatPrince Harry Has the memory writing due next year sent shock waves through Buckingham and Kensington Palaces, which would have been ignored by a prince TELL-all pounded by the Prince was in the exercise. The royal family was already angry with the worst with the release of the next month of theEdition update of the SUJSY 2020Find freedom, who said to himself covered the history of the scenes of Megxit as well as the events of the life of the sussexes since their move to California, as the nearest friends and allies of the couple said.

Harry has made one point in hisstatement on his brief He wrote "a first-hand story of [her] life that is precise and totally truthful" and will be "intimate and sincere". In accordance with his promise to be accurate and honest, there is a particularly injuring lie on the prince that it is unlikely to address his next book. Read it to find out what Harry is sure to avoid in his memory and background of his origins.

The allegations that Harry was notPrince Charles' son, but rather the child love ofprincess diana andMajor James Hewittpersisted for decades. The gossip has been fed over the years by the slight resemblance of the prince of red head to Hewitt when, in fact, Diana's father was a redhead and his sisters and his brothers,Charles, Earl SpencerAll had red hair when they were young. It is clear that Harry grew up to look a lot in Charles with his closed blue eyes and his nose almost identical.

More importantly, Harry was born in 1984, two years before Diana even met Hewitt. Many of those closer to the princess, including his old bodyguardKen Wharfe, condemned the lie and pronounced against her in the hope of putting rumors to rest. Wharfe wrote in his 2002 bookDiana: secret closely kept: "The malicious rumors that always persist on the paternity of Prince Harry greatly used Diana's anger. The absurdity should be taped here and now ... and the red hairdressers so love as evidence are, of course, a line Spencer. "

There were several reports thatCharles addressed rumors With Harry, while 16 years old, before leaving to Eton College and assured him that he was his biological father.

"Harry would never touch this topic," said a sourceBetter life. "It was simple gossip and wounded Diana deeply, so there is little song Harry mentioning something in his brief."

RELATED:The Palace has published this "warning shot" in Harry & Meghan, say sources.

In the course of herinfamous interview With the BBC journalist now discreditedMartin Bashir, Diana admitted that his relationship with Hewitt was more than close friendship. Bashir asked, "Were you unfaithful?" in regards toDiana's relationship with hewitt, to which she replied, "Yes, I loved it. Yes, I was in love with him. But I was very dropped."

According toMany accounts, Diana started to see Hewitt at the same time, Charles took over her business with thenCamilla Parker Bowles, which became the duchess of Cornwall when the couple married in 2005. The princess learned that the princess learned that he was captain of staff of the domestic cavalry whose responsibilities included the management of the stables.

In the maintenance of the BBC, Diana stated that it was "devastated" of Hewitt's decision to collaborate with the authorAnna PasternakOn the Tell Called BookLoving princess In 1994, two years after the breakdown of the princess with him and a year before the interview of the BBC. "He was a great friend to me at a very difficult and difficult time, and he was still there to support me and I was absolutely devastated when this book appeared, because I trusted him," said Diana Bashir. "And yes, there was factual evidence in the book, but many of them were, comes from another world, were not equivalent to what happened."

Redemption of the history of the case through the very romantic version of the Hewitt's Weight's Hewitt's events attributed that after Diana has worn his heart to his riding instructor of his depth of loneliness and misfortune, the 'Military career man has been prompted to take "the first steps" to become more than friends by taking his hand and saying the princess, "you are not alone, you have me." Diana told Bashir: "There was a lot of fantasy in this book, and it was very painful for me that one of my friends, to whom I had trusted, made me money. I I'm really joining me 10 days before her arrival in the bookstores to tell me that there was nothing to fear, and I thought it, stupidly. "

In his bookDiana Chronicles,Tina Brown Describing Hewitt as "a younger, cute, less complicated and less responsible for Prince Charles: cordial, manual and handsome in the big, chiseled, Storybook Way that Diana has always admired." When Diana broke his five-year relationship with Hewitt in 1992, he returned his back by agreeing to be the main source of Pasternak's book. In 1999, two years after Diana's death, Hewitt wrote his own book,Love and war, about his relationship with the princess.

Years later, however, Hewitt denied being Harry's father, tell theSunday mirrorIn 2002: "There really isno possibility that I am Harry's father. I can absolutely make sure I'm not. Certainly, red hair look like mine and people say we are like ourselves. I have never encouraged these comparisons and even if I've been with Diana for a long time, I have to say once and for all that I'm not Harry's father. When I met Diana, he was already a toddler. "

But in 2003, in a truly amazing betrayal, a hewitt was attached to cash attempted to sell his letters from Diana to the most offering, claiming that they were worth at least $ 10 million (about $ 14 million).Hewitt justified his actions sayingLarry King, "I think it's important to understand that they are or will become important historical documents ... I think it would be irresponsible to destroy them," he added. "If they were sold for 10 million pounds sterling, I think you know, ask your peers who would not be inclined to sell them for that?"

And for more new royals sent directly to your inbox, sign up for ourDaily newsletter.

Richard Kay, a long-standing and well-connected royal correspondent, wrote in an article of July 20 for theDaily mailthat a "senior figure" criticizedHarry's decision to write the memoir. "It takes a kind of special hypocrisy to complain about your privacy, then cooperate on an intimate memory covering all aspects of your life," said the source. Kay also noted that for a peak day of $ 20 million, Harry had to promise to serve a lot of royal tea, which could include more details on hisRIFT with William, "which could potentially be the most damaging all for the long termWell-being of the monarchy. "

A royal initiate saidBetter life: "For a man who left the United Kingdom to get away from the media in search of privacy, he simply can not tear up the spotlight. Harry kissed the American celebrity. There is never had a member of the royal family who constantly talked about his own life in the media like that while dragging the rest of the family in the mud. It will probably not deal with lies about Hewitt, but there is many other things he could and write about it could upset the family. His mother gave an interview andcame to regret bitterlyBut Harry keeps talking. The royals are horrified. "

RELATED:Inside the "very complicated" relationship between Harry and the Queen

Diane Clehane is a reporter based in New York and author ofImagine Diana andDiana: the secrets of his style.