Good Lifestyle

The Oxford English Dictionary defines "man flu" as such: "A cold or minor illness similar as experienced by a man seen as exaggerating the severity of symptoms." For years irremblant men from women complaining that men are feeling the effects of the way flu worse than their female counterparts. Women have, in response, rolled their eyes and told the men they were just babies and needed to suck.

Now, anew Article published in the issue of ChristmasBritish medical newspaper alleges that "human flu" might not be an excuse for moaning colds. Dr. Sue Kyle, assistant professor of clinical family medicine at Memorial University in St. Johns,told CBC He had been "criticized for exaggerating my symptoms when I had the flu," he decided to see if the myth of human influenza had scientific merit or not.

First, he examined some mouse studies indicating that women are much more immune systems than men. Then he considered another study in which 63 men and healthy women were injected with a common virus and found that women had a cell immune response stronger than men. Combined with 1997-2007 observational study that showed that men died of complications from the flu more often than women, and a survey showing that men take more work time when women are sick that women, and came to the conclusion that human influenza may actually have support for it.

Sue also said that the ability of a woman to exacerbate the flu could better throw in hormones.

"Testosterone is a hormone that actually acts as an immunosuppressant," he said. "While estrogen works in the opposite direction. They stimulate the immune system. For that higher testosterone with men end up being more susceptible to viral respiratory and tend to aggravate them."

Of course, Sue admitted that none of the evidence was conclusive. Many studies that were drawn based on research on mice and the investigation claiming that the men abducted the job more often than women could disprove his theory that the more support, depending on how you look. Not to mention, Sue also admitted that his findings were not entirely impartial:

"The whole point of this article is to prove that men are not verbrés glasses. [We] need to have the benefit of the doubt rather than being criticized for not working well during the flu or the common cold. "

Shortly after that his study has passed viral, Gizmodoissued a rebuke in which he argued that the study was a joke of a series of jokes "that the BMJ plays every year around the holidays. In a statement to the exit, Sue said that while some of his comments are supposed to be the -In language plays, the search itself is not #fakenews.

"The science is real, despite the humorous lens, it is examined through," said Sue, adding that the BMJ "does not publish anything which is wrong."

Whether a joke or not, more definitive research should be conducted (preferably on humans, not mice) to conclude that men suffer worse symptoms than women when taking the flu. However, there are other recent studies that indicate that female immune systems are stronger than anyone had previously imagined. A recent study postulated that becauseWomen treat oxygen faster than men when they exercise, they are more naturally sportsTaking credibility to the idea that there are ways in which women are biologically stronger than men. And for great ways to avoid the disease to start here, hereSimple way to prevent the flu.

To discover more incredible secrets about the life of your best life,Click hereRegister for our free daily newsletter!