The safety precaution Covid Safety Dr. Fauci does not approve

Although this can be a safe alternative for the vote, Dr. Faisci was limited to give his approval.


With the presidential elections, those responsible and citizens wonder whatThe vote will look like the coronavirus pandemic. Although the vote in person has long been the most popular method of contributing to the democratic process, many highlighted the mail-in postal vote as a potentially safer option, especially for seniors or those who are more at risk Graves Covid-19. However, in a recent interview withThe Washington Post,Anthony Fauci, MD, the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), would not beapprove the vote by mail, seeing as he became a very controversial subject with the presidentDonald Trump.

"I do not see any reason why, if people keep this type of physical distancing, wearing a mask and wash your hands - why you can not, at least where I vote, go to a place and vote," Tit to FauciTheWashington Post"SJacqueline Alemany August 7th.

He stressed that grocery stores and other essential establishments are examples of these guidelines at the top of these guidelines, adding that surveys should be harmless until everyone takes theAppropriate precautions.

When you supported the e-mail voting, Fauci was hesitant to answer. "I do not wantComment on voting by mail, Jackie, because it's almost certainly used as a sound bank, "he said." It's a sport now to Washington to believe me against the president and I do not really want to do that. "

President Trump has been vocal of his opposition to the vote Mail-in, often tweet that he could tilt results and cause electoral fraud.

Yet, according to disease control centers and prevention (CDC),The mail-in vote is an acceptable alternative in person vote. "The more one interacts with others, and the longer this interaction, the higher the risk of covid-19 propagation", explains the CDC. "Elections with a single one-day vote are a higher risk for the spread of COVID-19 because there will be bigger crowds and a longer wait time."

Instead, the CDC recommends that there be a variety of polling options and periods, so people can be spaced and uncluttered inside at a polling station while wait. The Agency Note:

The voting settings at low risk elections are those with:

-A wide variety of voting options

-Woven voting periods (more days and / or more hours)

- Other options feasible to reduce the number of voters who gather inside in the voting locations at a time

RELATED:For more information up to date, sign up for our daily newsletter.

With regard to the preoccupation of the President of Fraud to vote,The Washington PostRecently conducted a data analysis of three voting-by-mail-coloredo, Oregon and Washington - with the help of the profitElectronic Registration Information Center (Eric). According to their conclusions, there was only "only 372 cases ofpotential fraud About 14.6 million voting ballots by mail in 2016 and 2018. "This translates to 0.0025 per cent.

In fact, research has shown that mail voting effectively increases the participation of voters. A recent university study of Stanford revealed that voting participation jumped by 2 percentage points in the states that allowedvote by universal mail Between 1996 and 2018. "Courier voting offers voters a considerable convenience, increases the rates of participation modestly, but has no discernable effect on the voting actions at the part or partisan part of the electorate", has concluded the study. And for more information from Fauci, checkMr. Fauci says there is now proof that coronavirus spreads in this way.


Categories: Health
Tags: Coronavirus / News
Oscar de la Hoya says he paid "Russian gangsters" to avoid a scandalous photo leakage
Oscar de la Hoya says he paid "Russian gangsters" to avoid a scandalous photo leakage
Which Asian food fits you by the zodiac sign
Which Asian food fits you by the zodiac sign
Amazing effects of wine drinking that you never know, according to science
Amazing effects of wine drinking that you never know, according to science