Good Lifestyle

With the coronavirus continuing towreak havoc throughout the country, health officials are blurring to seek solutions. Hugespikes in the number of new cases Have been linked to people gathering bars, restaurants, casinos and other areas interior to trafficking. And although this clearly indicates a widespread failure to practice social distancing, many experts argue that it is also a potential evidence of a crucial characteristic of coronavirus - it is said that the World Health Organization (WHO) still has not properly treated:Coronavirus is airborne.

According toThe New York Times, a group of 239 scientists from 32 countrieshave issued an open letter at WHO with the urgent demand to modify their recommendations on the protection against coronavirus, citing the likelihood that the virus can betransmitted through the air- Close contact with infected individuals - via small particles. These behind the letter intend to publish it in a scientific newspaper this week.

Throughout the pandemic, the official position of WHO was this coronavirusspread widely the respiratory droplets "When a person is in close contact (less than 1 meter) from someone with respiratory symptoms" such as coughing or sneezing, the need to wear masks and keep at least six feet apart from others people. Which also recognized that airborne transmission of the virus is possible, but only during certain medical procedures - aerosol-generating procedures (AGP), which produce tiny microbes called aerosols. What they are not behind, however, it is the idea that coronavirus can be transmitted through the air outside these specific circumstances.

"Especially in the last two months, we have repeatedly indicated that we consider airborne transmission as possible, but certainly not supported by solid or even clear evidence", "Benedetta Allegranzi, MD, Technical Manager on the control of infections for WHO, saysThe New York Times. "There is a strong debate about it."

RELATED:For more information up to date, sign up for our daily newsletter.

The debate mentioned by Allegranzi has been in progress. Essentially, which differs firmly between the respiratory droplets that infect when they are expelled in close contact with another person and tiny aerosols that can only infect during one of the above-mentioned APRs. Scientists say that the distinction is out of the brand, as we know that droplets and aerosols are produced by patients and not only as a result of an AGP.

"We have known since 1946 that coughing and conversation generate aerosols"Linsey Marr, an airborne transmission expert at Virginia Tech, saidThe New York Times.

Experts say that there are a variety of factors to play with respect to bidge's WHO refusal - from politics to an obsolete definition of "airborne transmission" to criteria that many believe to be "too much rigid ".Change position would also mean the modification of how the organization operates, a member of the prevention of infections and the WHO control committee saidThe New York Times.

"I am frustrated by the problems of airflow and dimensioning the particles, absolutely"Mary-Louise McLaws, an epidemiologist at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, said. "If we started to review the flow of air, we should be ready to change a lot of what we do. I think it's a good idea, a very good idea, but it will bring a huge thrill in society in society. infection control. "

Even without "irrefutable evidence" that coronavirus can be transmitted in the air by inhalation of aerosols, experts say who should assume the worst of the virus, use the common sense, and then make the best possible recommendation. When overlooking the possibility that coronavirus is airborne, they manage the risk of people and companies that do not take the appropriate precautions needed to prevent such transmission.

"There is no irrefutable proof that Sars-Cov-2 travels or is transmitted significantly by the aerosols, but there is absolutely no evidence that it is not the case" "Trish Greenhalgh, MD, a primary care physician at Oxford University, said The New York Times . "So, when we have to make a decision in the face of uncertainty and goodness, it's a disastrous decision if we are wrong. So why not just hide for a few weeks, just in case?" And for more the second wave of coronavirus, These are the four new epicenter of the pandemic, the former head of the FDA says .