There is now an "unambiguous proof" Covid in this way, say experts
This could be the "smoking pistol" proof of a controversial form of coronavirus transmission.
Few debates inflamed as much controversy as the one on behalf of whether or notCovid-19 is airborne. For the first months of the Coronavirus pandemic, the World Health Organization (WHO) maintained that theThe virus is not in the air, an affirmation that many experts and health professionals have countered. In recent weeks, more and more evidence has emerged that reinforcement claims that the virus can be transmitted via aerosols (respiratory droplets), leadingEven WHO for relat. And now,A new study seems to offer irrefutable proof after capturing the virus living in the air.
The study, which has not yet been examined by peers, comes from a research team at the University of Florida whichViral particles isolated in the air Covid patient hospital rooms. Significantly, these aerosols were discovered up to 16 meters from patients, a lot of father than the6 feet distance That disease and prevention control centers (CDC) recommend you to keep others.
"That's what people claimed"Linsey Marr, PhD, Professor at Virginia Tech and Airborne Transmission Expert, saidThe New York Times. "It's an unambiguous proof that there isInfectious virus in aerosols. "On Twitter, Marr called the study a"smoking gun. "
The capture of the viral particles in the air is a challenge and another that previous studies have struggled to know why many experts are so impressed by this study. Researchers collected several samples from a Covid Room from the University of Florida Health Shands Hospital.
The proof that coronavirus can be transmitted via aerosols is particularly significant with regard to the current conversation around to slow the spread of the virus. With the knowledge that it is much easier toCOVID Contract of Respiratory Droplets to touch infected surfaces, experts have focused on ventilation, noting thatmediocre ventilation is one of the main risk factors for the propagation of coronavirus.
RELATED:For more information up to date, sign up for our daily newsletter.
Despite the assertion of the tearing that the study is proof of its sought-after, everyone is not convinced. VirologistAngela Rasmussen, PhD, saysThe New York Times"I'm just not sure these numbers are high enough to cause someone's infection."
For targeted people on the container of the COVID epidemic, any research on the propagation of the virus is a step in the right direction - with safer to follow. And if you want to stay safe,This facial coating is effectively worse than no mask at all, studying.
