The new position of the WHO on Lockdowns is already applied
The agency is now vocalizing the overuse of locks.
Since the beginning of the pandemic, many people - economists to public health experts in politicians - have been returned to whetherapply is the best way to contain Covid. In a shooting of surprising events on October 8, the Special Envoy of the World Health Organization on COVID-19,David Nabarro, MD, said WHO does not advocate lockdowns as the main way toCONTROL COVID. Read it to know what the position of WHO really means, and for a state that struggled to contain the virus,This state has become the child "posters" for the way not to handle Covid.
For the most part, health officials have advocated the implementation of early implementation to mitigate the spread of COVID.Anthony Fauci, MD, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), recently confirmed that it was personallyRecommended a national closure ToDonald TrumpAt the beginning of the pandemic. However, as the pandemic has dragged, Fauci often said that there has often been saidshould not be necessary to return to lockdown.
While Nabarro notes that an hour and a place where a lock is necessary, he insists on themdo more harm than well When implemented too frequently and without the appropriate planning accompanying it. "We in theWorld Health Organization Do not recommend locks as a means of primary control of this virus, "he said." The only time we believe that a lock is justified is to buy you time to reorganize, group, rebalance your resources, to protect your health workers who are exhausted, but wholesale, we would prefer not to do it. "
If the time during locking is used to formulate an action plan, it could deny the need for additional locking. "We think the Lockdowns serve only on one goal, and it's to give you a little breathing to stop everything," continued Nabarro. "The virus stops moving, and while you have this respiratory space, you should be reallyBuild your tests, Building your contact tracing, build your local organization, so that when you release the lock, you must have more cases, but you can really face it, really elegantly. "
Trump President and Canadian businessmanMaxime Bernier, among others, locked on the claim that theWho reversed their position On the locks and condemned them absolutely, but the complete declaration of Nabarro is a little more nuanced. It emphasized what many anticipated health officials for all: locking should be used as the last resort rather than a catchall, the one who reiterated, and the time spent in the lock should be used for strategyMeasures to mitigate the propagation of the virus Once the lock is lifted.
Of course, many state governors have been adapted to what locks are unnecessary, if not harmful. Read at a glance at the states where the leaders voted against closure and for more the way the pandemic has changed,The White House warns that Covid is "very different" now.
1 Florida
At the latest on August 31, governor of FloridaRon DesantisDelivered a passionate statement against additional locks.
"We will do itNever make these lockdowns again againAnd I hear that people say they will close the country and honestly, I worry, "said desantis at a press conference at the village retirement community. And for more recent coronavirus updates of large health organizations,The CDC finally recognized that Covid spreads in the air.
2 Georgia
According to Wabe, Georgia GovernorBrian Kempsaid on September 1st, "IDo not see us to impose new restrictions with the numbers we see now. I do not want to go back and start stoping things again. "
Georgia was one of the first states to peel restrictions at the end of April, at theconsternation of many scientists and other politicians from the state. And to find out where coronavirus cases decrease,These are the only states where COVID cases fall.
3 Texas
Governor of TexasGreg Abbott resisted the implementation of a mask mandate andopposed to the idea of locking, according toTexas Tribune. As Texas sharpened cases during the summer, Abbott has been frequently requested if there was a potential lock. "I get this question, it seems that a thousand times a day. People panic, thinking that I'm about toClose the Texas again. The answer is no, "said Abbott Kprc 2 on July 15th.
"If we were closed for two weeks, while some people ask, once we opened the backup, then you see things start to spread again," he continued. "Until There are drugs to slow down the propagation of the coronavirus, there is only one thing that can slow spread, and it is by people who adopt the use of the use of a face guard. Somehow each time they come out. "And if you want to know how to practice the safety of the mask while in restaurant,That's what you should do with your mask by eating, says Dr. Faisci.
4 South Dakota
South Dakota has experienced a recent case in recent weeks, but to the governor.Kristi Noem Remains firmly anti-lock. During a special legislative session of October 5, she said itRefusal to implement a mass closure was "solitary enough sometimes," said ABC News.
"But earlier this week, a very important national journalist sent me a note that said:" Governor, if you did not have the lock of Locks, we had no proof of the way they really have were useless, "said Noem. And for more information up to date,Sign up for our daily newsletter.
