This facial coating is effectively worse than no mask at all, studying

These researchers tested several different types and materials, and this is the least effective.


Although this has become much more widely accepted in recent monthscovering his nose and mouth Can help reduce coronavirus case numbers, experts have developed time and time that all face coatings are not created equal. Recently, the teachers at Duke University have developed a test easily replicated to just gaugeHow different types of masks and face coatings disrupt the expulsion of respiratory droplets that may contain coronavirus particles. A particular type of facial coating has marked so low that it is frightened that not carrying any mask at all:Researchers have found that your neck fleece does not work against COVID when it comes to containing droplets.

As indicated byFast business,Teachers in Duke Developed their test mechanism (they say can be backed by other laboratories and / or companies producing masks) when approached by a group of local volunteers who wanted to give face coatings to those of necessity - and to donate a kind that would actually protect.Eric Westman, MD, the school of medicine, andMartin Fischer, PhD, the Department of Chemistry, collaborated on a test using a black box, a laser and a cell phone camera to view the respiratory droplet model.

RELATED:For more information up to date, sign up for our daily newsletter.

The resulting study, published inAdvance of scienceExplains that masks have been tested by a person who then spoke the same sentence in the box of the same amount of times. The droplets have been visible thanks to the light supplied by the laser. "A simple computer algorithm [a] used to count the droplets of the video", reads paper, providing data for researchers to classify efficiency masks.

The researchers tested 14 types of different masks and a sheet of mask material. Not surprisingly, the adjustmentN95 mask, as the wear of health workers, were more effective for disturbing the droplets, followed by a surgical mask and a poly-cotton mix mask. The cotton versions by hand fell a little further. And last on the list, even below no mask at all - was aSweatshirt. Sometimes called Gold Gaiter, it's a commonly borne item by riders or people participating in other outdoor sports and activities to stay warm. It can be worn around the neck or stopped on his face.

Aerial view of gray cotton neck fleece isolated on white background
exit

But the watches of the neck are not designed to block the propagation of the droplets and, as these researchers found - are terrible. Speaking with a fleece on more droplets generated than talking without one. This is probably because the material of gu behaue actually diffuses droplets, generating smaller ones. "Of course, so the problem is that small particles could actually be carried away much easier than large particles that might simply fall on the ground," said FischerFast business.

Although there wasContradictory comments made by public health agencies to know if airborne transmission is a serious danger of COVID, many experts believe thatIt's a major concern. It is proved that the infection does not only occur from direct contacts to anyone (that is, a person with Covid coughs on your face) but can also occur throughAerosolized droplets persistent in the air. For this reason, Duke researchers pose that small droplets created from speech (or coughing, sneezing, singing, etc.) through a flew can be even more dangerous than what you generate without Cover your face.

So, while these products may have kept comfortably on many winter jogs, they are not suitable for the protection of Covid. Stick to other forms of face coatings and put your gaiter away for now. And for more ways to choose the right, checkIf your mask does not have two of them, it does not work, the study says.


Categories: Health
Tags: Coronavirus
5 ways you're "healthy" does not go, says science
5 ways you're "healthy" does not go, says science
Secret Signal You can have a new Alzheimer's study
Secret Signal You can have a new Alzheimer's study
17 things you are nostalgic but should not be
17 things you are nostalgic but should not be