These 2 precautions of COVID may not be necessary after all, a new study finds
According to new research, these measures may not be the key to the fight against VOC.
There are a lot of precautions that we take every day to try to stop the spread of COVID. For nearly a year now, we wash with our hands diligently, wearing face masks in public and trying to keep six feet between us and anyone in our household. But on a larger scale, different countries have taken differentApproaches to mitigate the virus, and even within the United States, precautions have varied from state to state.Full stopThe mandates of companies and masks are just some of the protocols implemented around the world to try to control the virus. As we had never treated something identical to Covid in our lives, there were girls in the best way to keep people safe. Now, a recent Stanford study at the University has discovered that two measures can not prevent the spread of COVID as much as we pensive.
To see what precautions could we jump, read on, and see what the future of Covid looks like, checkThe CEO of Moderna has just made this frightening prediction on Covid.
Read the original article onBetter life.
The comparative study the countries that are closed to those who did not do it.
For the study, which was published in the Wiley Online Library on January 5, researchers examined COVID cases in 10 countries to determine how the various are beneficial.precautionary measures proved to be, specifically examining more restrictive measures such as locking and closures.
Researchers compared Covid business in England, France, Germany, Iran, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain and the United States, which have all established orders and compulsory trade closures at home - at South Korea and Sweden, which has only implemented voluntary personal precautions. .
And to see if you are at risk of Covid now, checkThe CDC says if you are this age, you are now more likely to catch Covid.
The results showed that there is "no clear and significant profit" for locking and business closures.
After comparing countries to more restrictive measures to those with less restrictive measures, it was clear to researchers that there are "no clear beneficial effect of [more restrictive measures] on the growth of cases in all countries".
Their conclusions suggest that mandatory locking do not significantly stop propagation more than personal measures such as social distance and mask. "We do not question the role of all public health or coordinated communications interventions on the epidemic, but we do not find an added benefit of home stay orders and trade closures," concluded authors.
And for more current Covid news delivered directly to your inbox,Sign up for our daily newsletter.
Research suggests less restrictive interventions can be as effective.
Sweden's approach included "social distancing guidelines, discouraging international and national displacements and a prohibition of large gatherings," while South Korea "relied on intensive investments in testing, contact tracing and The isolation of infected cases and narrow contacts ", according to Stanford Research. Even without more restrictive measures, Sweden and South Korea had both some of the lowest reported covidation cases for a large part of the pandemic.
As a result, researchers concluded that "similar reductions in case growth can be carried out with less restrictive interventions" similar to those implemented by these two countries.
To see the most recent update of the CDC on the vaccine, checkThe CDC has just given a shocking update of COVID vaccine.
In fact, home stay orders could potentially increase the spread of COVID.
A studyPublished in the newspaperIndoor airIn October, examined 318 epidemics in China in which three or more cases have been identified. The researchers divided the epidemics into six categories: houses, transport, food, entertainment, shopping and others - and they found people 19 times more likely toGet the virus at home. Similarly, the search for Caroline University of Caroline Chapelle Hill has determined that your home is the mostCommon place for COVID-19 transmission.
This is probably why Stanford's researchers noted that "home residence orders may easier to facilitate the transmission if they increase contacts to the person where transmission is effective, such as closed spaces. " They cited a November study published in the magazineScience who identified aIncreased transmissions and cases During a home-based home order in Hunan, China, due to intra-household transmission.
And to see what you could do to prevent the propagation of COVID, checkThese 3 things could prevent almost all cases of Covid, study .
What you need to know about Starbucks New Vegan Vegan Cold Breight
