Good Lifestyle

In the last six months, many experts and major health organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO), maintained that CIVID-19 is not an airborne virus. Instead, it is mainly transmitted a person to a person through liberated respiratory droplets when infected individual cough, sneezed, speaks or raises the voice. These droplets then attract into the mouth or nose of people who are nearby or possibly, inhaled by the lungs or fall on the ground. However, a new team of international experts claims that WHO has not been widespread on the nature of the exact propagation of coronavirus - and that, in fact, can be in the air after all.

The word seems to be "loaded"

The group, consisting of 239 scientists from around the world, says the virus can actually float inside the air droplets and is probably widespread this way. This would make airborne nature. However, according to Donald Milton, one of the authors of the open letter to the World Health Organization and other health agencies undertaken this week in the medical newspaperInfectious clinical Diseases, Agencies are afraid of discussing coronavirus airborne nature.

"The airport transmission word seems to be loaded," said MiltonCnnon Sunday. "I guess we hope that know who will come and be more willing to recognize the main roles of aerosols, that they want to call airborne transmission or not."

The consequences could be enormous

If, in fact, the virus is airborne, it would mean that the droplets of it would not fall immediately on the ground. Instead, they could linger in the air inside, infecting anyone nearby. It could make almost impossible to contain the virus in congested spaces with low ventilation, even with masks and precautions for social distancing in place.

"Ventilation systems in schools, retirement homes, residences and businesses may need to minimize recirculating air and add new powerful filters. Ultraviolet headlamps may be required to kill floating viral particles in tiny droplets inside, "says theNew York Times.

"I am very concerned about the general public and schools and ventilation in school buildings and dormitories on university campuses and in bars and churches and where people sing and where people gather", has confessed ", Milton.

WHO states that the evidence is "unconvincing"

Dr. Benedetta Allegranzi, WHO Technical Manager on Infection Control, told theNyt The evidence of the propagation of the air virus were unconvincing.

"Especially in the last two months, we have repeatedly stated that we consider airborne transmission as possible, but certainly not supported by solid or even clear evidence," she said. "There is a strong debate about it."

However, the publication claims to intervene nearly 20 scientists, including a dozen WHO members as well as several members of the committee who made the guidelines - which claim the opposite.

"Whether we wear Aloft by large droplets that zoomed by the air after an eternate, or by droplets exhaled much smaller can slip the length of a room, these experts said the coronavirus is supported by the air. and can infect people when inhaled. TheNyt.

A consultant who remained anonymous, said that WHO "die defending their point of view".

"I am frustrated by the problems of air flow and dimensioning of particles, absolutely," said Mary-Louise McLaws, a member of the committee and epidemiologist at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, told the newspaper . "If we started to review the airflow, we should be ready to change a lot of what we do," she said. "I think it's a good idea, a very good idea, but it will provoke a huge thrill in the infection control society."

The authors of the letter ask WHO to update their recommendations for COVID-19. A spokesman for who saidCNBCOn Monday, he was aware of the open letter reported and would probably "inform him of the Group's regular press on Monday. However, WHO ended up postpone the meeting until Tuesday, July 7th.

Go through this pandemic at your healthier, do not miss these Things you should never do during the pandemic coronavirus .