Good Lifestyle

At this point, just about every nutrient has spent its fair share of dogs in the dog's house. For years, we crossed fats, then we spent the dissolution of carbohydrates and salt. Now it seems that the time of sugar came - and not without reason. The average American consumes three added sugar books every week, which adds to 156 pounds a year. Not only consuming too many sweet things causing weight gain, heart disease and diabetes, but recent research has also found that sugar is more addictive than cocaine and considerably worse for blood pressure than salt.

As proof continues to stack against sugar, consumers are looking for ways to have their cake and eat it too literally. To meet the demand, food manufacturers make it possible to generate sugar-free foods such as puddings, cookies and candy. The only problem is that these foods are not as innocent as they seem and their marketing claims are totally misleading. Often the term "sugar-free" is used to describe foods that do not contain white sugar but are still filled with other sugars derived from fruits and milk, which contribute smoothness and calories, such as table sugar. .

If you thought it was sneaky, you may want to sit for this next shocking shock: because of a legislative loophole, "without sugar" can also be slapped on food containing white sugar. "Technically, the term can be used if a food contains less than 0.5 grams of sugar per serving," says Toby Amidor, M.S., R.D., Nutrition Expert and author ofGreek yogurt cuisine: more than 130 healthy and delicious recipes for every meal of the day. (If these regulations seem familiar, it is because there are similar laws for the labeling of trans fats.) Take abandoned sugar, for example: although most of their sweetness comes from alternative sources of sugar like sweet (sucralose) alcohols, artificial sweeteners (such as potassium acesulfam) or sugar substitutes (such as polydextrose), they also contain milk - which naturally contains a sugar called lactose, and dextrose, a sugar commonly used Starchs derived. Nevertheless, the product is still marketed as sugar-free and that the nutrition label also affirms that the product has zero gram of sugar. Yes, Nabisco can get out of it because cookies have less than 0.5 grams per serving, but a little sugar here and he can sneak on you-especially when it comes from food you suppose do not count in your daily allowance.

Do not misunderstand us, we are not there to tell you to completely avoid sugar sources like fruits, maple syrup or milk. Many foods containing natural sugars also provide essential nutrients. But be aware that the body can not distinguish between natural and manifest sugars, so if it is consumed in large quantities, even sugar of things like honey and pure fruit juice can still have negative effects on weight and health.

The bottom line: If you want something sweet, pass "sugar-free" options and eat what you really want moderation. (If you are diabetic, consult your doctor for healthy and safe ways to reduce the "sugar-free" foods transformed into your diet.) Why? When manufacturers take sugar from products, they often add bad greases for you, such as palm oil and taste for taste, explains Amidor. "They also use sugar alcohols, which may have an excess laxative effect." In addition, it is easier to keep track of the amount of sugar you consume when it is clearly printed on the package - not hidden behind the "zero gram" claims. If you do not want to move away from your sugar-free treats, read the label before assuming the claims are true. All types and sources of sugar serve little nutritional things and must be consumed with moderation.