Good Lifestyle

It's the end of 2019 and women still have trouble feeling really equal to menin society. Of course, it depends so closely in the country that you meet, your education, your level of income and your vision of the world you are, but the issue of women and their place in the company still relevant. But maybe some things have changed. Let's take a lighter of the guy from the way to the memory and take a look at the famous feminist works created in the 70s and 80s and see if they still remain relevant in 2019. Spoilers alert - they could.

1. Some live women artists / latest dinner by Mary Beth Edelson

Mary Beth Edelson took the latest classic subperpain and created a collage in which she replaced the heads of engines with those of women. And not just a woman, but female artists. For example in the middle of the college instead of Jesus, we liveorgia o'keeffe, which is a famous artist known as Mother ofamerican modernism.

2. Semiotics of Martha Catler's cuisine

The semiotics of the kitchen is a 6-minute video of Martha Rossler in 1975. In the video, Martha is debugbehind a table with many kitchen appliances. She chooses ChaqueaPliance and demonstrates how it is supposed to be used in Arather Frank and sometimes violently. Martha has specifically chosen household appliances so that they can be considered as extensions of the hand and hand of Awoman. She also chose to make a video so that it can be shown on a monitor, a small box, symbolizing a box that women are placed in the context of the norms of society.

3. Picnic in Giverny by Faith Ringgold

The picnic at Giverny deserves a special place in the world of feminist art, because the whole idea was to return the roles and show that women are much more than for someone to stay behind a good man.

4. Judy Chicago dinner

Dinner is probably one of the most famous feminist works in the world and it is always relevant and popular to this day even though it was created in the 70's. This is a mixed multimedia installation composed of a compound triangle large tables for a banquet. The tables are fixed for 39 famous women (real and fictitious / mythical), each celebrating their achievements. In each plate, there is the sculpture by rising from it, which looks like something between a flower and a butterfly, each different and unique.

5. Should women be naked ...? by guerrilla girls

Guerillagirls is an anonymous feminist group of activists who are not obliged to ask important questions. They make installations, incredible representations and are not greater than the use of humor to get their environment. One of the injustices they referred to the 80s were the lack of female representation in the art, the media and Lewood. And if they are seen in museums or movies, it is legitimate in the nude. The question is - women should they be bumping to enter the Met Museum?

6. Untitled (Ishop So I am) Barbara Kruger

This feminist artwork was created in the late 1980s and is supposed to show how the media sees women. Most advertisements for women have been manufactured by men and the general hypothesis was that all women want all women to go shopping and acquire materialistic goods and that's what makes us happy.

7. S.o.s. - Series of objects at the time of Hannah Wilke

Hannah Wilke has created a series of self-portraits in which she has laid nushless with pieces of chewing gum in shape to look like female genitations glued to her face and body. The reason she chose chewing gum was because in her mind was the ideal way to represent the way women are treated in society - something to chew, thrown and easily replaced.